From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?B?Sm/Do28gVMOhdm9yYQ==?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Distinguishing `consp` and `functionp` Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2024 16:25:38 +0000 Message-ID: References: <86msssble8.fsf@gnu.org> <86bk9448ai.fsf@gnu.org> <864jew40m3.fsf@gnu.org> <861qa03ytb.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="23534"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 29 17:26:41 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rUUT3-0005pI-Ek for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 29 Jan 2024 17:26:41 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rUUSL-0002gy-Jp; Mon, 29 Jan 2024 11:25:57 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rUUSJ-0002gl-NT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Jan 2024 11:25:55 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-lf1-x133.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::133]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rUUSH-0006Tf-Ih; Mon, 29 Jan 2024 11:25:55 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-lf1-x133.google.com with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-51028acdcf0so3437153e87.0; Mon, 29 Jan 2024 08:25:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1706545550; x=1707150350; darn=gnu.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=LQofCwwfUD4/EioQXSSc6Sbio+wq0ABlk/g50sgTKQk=; b=UVqsgI1YRPaasgSekA0pauzenX5hxBqhm29WatlBsfPiSHnwfQ9L9WdOe8BgeZJK/5 hjLBpB9Yfsx0WvDdyjUOR0oJCx9lsaw82nv7G4SAZrSKaxQyLhYX7+BTrDdBX30DBRpi /H/yzmdbHcZBA6cmhOHToOZGnpr5wm76FlXNq+AsTTYOS3u2/3kxFNtDh4iiTdKIEmuu nkm6gFHOTOM8Q+MwHBYxK+qkEKFajb6z72InFL6cHHDXsgLKpb9yNGgrsuY/mpbd6dTJ dzCL/BJjhbX6d3dUQ1IcCLzqP8o/93516obVoQW8VwTtjx3nd4Tdkmr3/Akgl9gLNEqw 4rNA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1706545550; x=1707150350; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=LQofCwwfUD4/EioQXSSc6Sbio+wq0ABlk/g50sgTKQk=; b=uwC/wY2DlpUmv085q3ZpDSOzlpJ2iSiTCXUiSzemo1c1De2yPll5Cy40OgUZdgu2cC 0baQpOlG9JnhX+o89KxV0sbQ3zcgiT9zPtHnjiMlMerQFrhHaozDrla9zXOdt6XoXcE/ 8WONNw5TPQ5BZu5Q6k/6Y4yPGYq9nX4IJbk0Z8qDTvwQaAihEfM7O2BFkWC/ZntSd2Q0 pGILa68229Ft49QWH6YXSGkAfJRAWvNeOYA8vS4vM7vwNawzKmhn6R8aBVzwzp3sVvrp vuXLlFzL7VriybelYAp1gLt32cmqyvL3ZUO67gIzVc2r9uu0jGBjRLNvEkpPnBsaxX+Z Hf3g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwaCd5Ke9mhN8UarvUG84tgH8mbDG3EjTCgB4zGHhjEPIxOCS4/ g3Yf+8B+U6G/MPZeCuxDc9cjQnSTQrZLzFBNAgS37QOZm7xpkh3rqpLRA85PBS1iE0UfJD6E0Xo zeGuzIH1NhNrLl4epyyDBLFLEdsDTSy/B X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFcmTMF0o3eRFjaBMSnFCXeErucTrb1t4E4GtyCI4n6GuFibSMNX6HDUCSe01WC885hljC+FFfF3wPNAzll+6o= X-Received: by 2002:ac2:4d8f:0:b0:511:17b7:db17 with SMTP id g15-20020ac24d8f000000b0051117b7db17mr195496lfe.52.1706545550213; Mon, 29 Jan 2024 08:25:50 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <861qa03ytb.fsf@gnu.org> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::133; envelope-from=joaotavora@gmail.com; helo=mail-lf1-x133.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:315600 Archived-At: On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 4:10=E2=80=AFPM Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > From: Jo=C3=A3o T=C3=A1vora > > Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2024 15:54:04 +0000 > > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org > > > > I don't think there is much space for philosophy or debate in noting > > for example, that a list as lambda won't get byte-compiled like a > > true lambda form. > > > > (byte-compile '(let ((bla (lambda () (+ 42 42)))) > > (funcall bla))) ;; -> (byte-code "\300\211 \207" [#[0 > > "\300\207" [84] 1]] 2) > > > > > > (byte-compile '(let ((bla '(lambda () (+ 42 42)))) > > (funcall bla)));; -> (byte-code "\300 \207" [(lambda > > nil (+ 42 42))] 1) > > I wonder why you considered that IU need this lecture. What lecture? I wasn't even writing to you, I was writing to Stefan, who said there are sometimes philosophical reasons for accepting the latter. Absolutely uncalled for. > > Stefan's patch moves us in the right direction if just for the guidance > > it gives to ignorant Lispers like the one who introduced that bug circa= 2009. > > I'm glad we have your approval. What would we do without it? You are a rude person. Jo=C3=A3o