From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jay Finger Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Rectangular regions Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2013 09:57:36 -0700 Message-ID: References: <52707D17.6010801@dancol.org> <8338niefba.fsf@gnu.org> <87a9hq8h7p.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> Reply-To: jay.finger@pobox.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c2c15e9fd15104ea2076e2 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1383325077 2195 80.91.229.3 (1 Nov 2013 16:57:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2013 16:57:57 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Bastien , Eli Zaretskii , Daniel Colascione , Leo Liu , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 01 17:58:02 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VcI2r-0000kI-T9 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 01 Nov 2013 17:58:02 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39206 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VcI2r-0004ZG-Jw for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 01 Nov 2013 12:58:01 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41623) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VcI2k-0004Z9-Gz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Nov 2013 12:57:59 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VcI2f-0003M3-F7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Nov 2013 12:57:54 -0400 Original-Received: from b-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com ([208.72.237.35]:33737 helo=smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VcI2U-0003LH-Kp; Fri, 01 Nov 2013 12:57:38 -0400 Original-Received: from smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by b-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 004F64DF43; Fri, 1 Nov 2013 12:57:38 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=mime-version :reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; s=sasl; bh=4vMLTrnYwuMDGJlFbQD6diC1Mlc=; b=HnV HTpqF1tsC4R8KKPKVq4MEssqVPEIKf6I8VktFx4iOgSwJwKLnFVhhYF54pFm3/lQ HNwcO9kw0vH50ROtH5fAdYoWhE684J/bq6+PrtBfeI+0KVfmOsT02ydO4Z6VG7L1 iPIOTiVppPjGVNEzQWNesK4eK3kUh2C68zqFa8xI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=mime-version :reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=foITMefhHyO9w0UQZ4W+6MFPVACY2 fm4sCXojas94Y21D2hASwJ+xFRAbNmGwF0FMvkIc8oDtUjmhWv/zGlZqgJxmU9Ml FOd2oK8NRM81o2OjfBe3WmCfMxWvzGLw3FGBI6qRr/SMXdUvZIUclYb7BBkHnIJT lDHCPgt8htAr00= Original-Received: from b-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by b-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCA814DF40; Fri, 1 Nov 2013 12:57:37 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail-qe0-f50.google.com (unknown [209.85.128.50]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by b-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4957E4DF3D; Fri, 1 Nov 2013 12:57:37 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: by mail-qe0-f50.google.com with SMTP id 1so2681474qee.23 for ; Fri, 01 Nov 2013 09:57:36 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=JjC/gI/9nSzPIZhArZ02bkYbhSXT0gIYQGO8h1UbYkI=; b=BK4TyAgR9PZ5NBNuZ3+q6iIayYrjpgrcU7+r0ehe/n6BKSePsQfR+7a8T9SZ/lhuXl Hya/6ZvoJJ/S1c2j4VGIGeHsanY3jtYL5JyDIlP3dwK6JgV6QcsDJQ9tJgbwqro1GfBc a8D9SiCNb9qgHULQQRRVCLXI2PrgBp7YpYWq1+oF+ag1JMQ8+aAvCKaMgTjD6XhcDqi/ XDcZqNdljGz72AYIJlTZLbkTenjsWTnMSF7KHr055wmL7H2vHEzxwRb685HLwJYGyLeW /eTrrlt6px5v2rlio/wqbC6H5ZwPFdIBh7AjyO6DDmHfFN4SnvLcMrw1a+gI8R99AMSM m05Q== X-Received: by 10.224.10.201 with SMTP id q9mr5360713qaq.8.1383325056878; Fri, 01 Nov 2013 09:57:36 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.96.178.103 with HTTP; Fri, 1 Nov 2013 09:57:36 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-Pobox-Relay-ID: B60CC28C-4316-11E3-9D12-1FFB7F2839F8-26623535!b-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux (Android) X-Received-From: 208.72.237.35 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:164812 Archived-At: --001a11c2c15e9fd15104ea2076e2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 6:40 PM, Stefan Monnier wrote: > > So to the extent that there is a vote, I would go for either 'M-x SPC' or > > 'C-SPC C-SPC', or 'C-M-SPC'. > > I assume you meant C-x SPC instead of M-x SPC (I guess we could > technically make M-x SPC do the job, but it would be a majorly ugly > hack). > You are correct. --001a11c2c15e9fd15104ea2076e2 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 6:40 PM, Stefan Monnier <= monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> wrote:
> So to the extent that= there is a vote, I would go for either 'M-x SPC' or
> 'C-SPC C-SPC', or 'C-M-SPC'.

I assume you meant C-x SPC instead of M-x SPC (I guess we could
technically make M-x SPC do the job, but it would be a majorly ugly
hack).

You are correct.=A0
<= /div>
--001a11c2c15e9fd15104ea2076e2--