On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 9:30 AM, David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org> wrote:

> John Yates <john@yates-sheets.org> writes:
> > On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 10:32 PM, Óscar Fuentes <ofv@wanadoo.es> wrote:
> >> dragonegg is GPLed.
> > Meaning it is above reproach.
>
> Not really.  "reproach" is something concerning intent rather than
> execution.


Point well taken.  I should have said "entirely legal".  And just for the
record, given awareness of the gcc project's goals and philosophy
(something I am sure the dragonegg developers possess) I acknowledge that
dragonegg is clearly a questionable undertaking.

/john