From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: John Yates Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [ELPA] New package: dape Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2023 10:53:52 -0400 Message-ID: References: <46ea1ab1-e447-4c83-9c81-2f9bd149fe91@alphapapa.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="14242"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Krister Schuchardt , Adam Porter , daniel@dpettersson.net, emacs-devel@gnu.org, philipk@posteo.net To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 20 16:54:57 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qtqtt-0003Ok-Bf for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 20 Oct 2023 16:54:57 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qtqt9-0004pG-Hb; Fri, 20 Oct 2023 10:54:11 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qtqt6-0004d6-A3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Oct 2023 10:54:08 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-ed1-f42.google.com ([209.85.208.42]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qtqt4-00064H-Mw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Oct 2023 10:54:08 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-ed1-f42.google.com with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-522bd411679so1358798a12.0 for ; Fri, 20 Oct 2023 07:54:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1697813644; x=1698418444; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=RhEiQnyZEoFME7bUPf9KWeS77xh8uE6t6cn3KjW6Wls=; b=vtzI4LFx9ngp9zVthKIMukcEDCmVvWm/F5fdU9qRhUAzV5Zkg0YNn8vgJKXRIG7FNe rr+ntHCoLQXyrmpRoJQ1gjeZ2j1HggQj5WirWiDcvTP9mlU92DHyxV6cGYZug16WKad+ IpkmlfzllK9UPEJNtqUmuSwkDZyILdYVMmtZ+QKxuXlgmBh70nnOifYHpLf9goRahACc GYF0Gh+sXhY9FzBTGZoNdgvnY9GwXDXnHgVbc6AZViYDqI5xPDNjSphjsvqNuOTDeGdu SMortID7MclYg5GLH69BtbAOgvrbtga+10GCZ3AehBqZTQntMs2nJefENtdiXBdHVQS+ f+0g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yzu4Bvifdlr7r6Q1lxIuXBHEJ3SXsJkPoYz+f0pa+s9t4bwS/4f NY8aaY2a8DP4XZF+AnrTucLV5GT7HK3kCYnl8gI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IE3m1yIA9MUVylhGHApfqHaauP3345zsuQ9L8eXIjEsHOND+LrtBseXGbilswyXFnDoSoys5p8NszBwjNwV6xk= X-Received: by 2002:a50:cd1b:0:b0:530:a186:f8a8 with SMTP id z27-20020a50cd1b000000b00530a186f8a8mr1585453edi.37.1697813644333; Fri, 20 Oct 2023 07:54:04 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.208.42; envelope-from=john.yates.sheets@gmail.com; helo=mail-ed1-f42.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -13 X-Spam_score: -1.4 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:311624 Archived-At: On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 7:07=E2=80=AFAM Dmitry Gutov wro= te: > > On 19/10/2023 13:52, Krister Schuchardt wrote: > > Has `dapper` been suggested? > > I wanted to suggest 'dapper' too. XD > > That could be interpreted as a subtle dig at dap-mode, though. Like, > you're dap, and I'm dapper. ;) Which is probably not the intention. If we want to avoid the suggestion of a dig, how about dappel?