From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: John Yates Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Adding support for xref jumping to headers/interfaces Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2023 12:51:25 -0500 Message-ID: References: <83bklin83z.fsf@gnu.org> <865ybmu2ha.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <39e25c9a-b4cc-a0ce-3f2a-1d2a1fc243d0@yandex.ru> <83pm9sfxfa.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="36679"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: rms@gnu.org, fgunbin@fastmail.fm, casouri@gmail.com, dgutov@yandex.ru, stephen_leake@stephe-leake.org, sbaugh@janestreet.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, azeng@janestreet.com To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 01 18:52:35 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pXQd0-0009NN-Dz for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 01 Mar 2023 18:52:34 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pXQcB-0004Hf-65; Wed, 01 Mar 2023 12:51:43 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pXQc9-0004Ec-Hc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Mar 2023 12:51:41 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-ed1-f54.google.com ([209.85.208.54]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pXQc8-0000Wi-1o; Wed, 01 Mar 2023 12:51:41 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-ed1-f54.google.com with SMTP id ec43so57187494edb.8; Wed, 01 Mar 2023 09:51:39 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; t=1677693097; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=z4I74bo8TkhV2BLqMUmAH86E2Jh+KGgaWu9pmuEH8P4=; b=76oHp+MXsgEJahUA5TuWVpV31sGG13IuLnlPNAKt+tY6aIn2IRIycKey+0M75d6dpR fBl79Hlr7/VvdI5lot7FZu0iOeIcyxfEtJlqKwlEt107G2C6DaPvqBlU4fbQVoutyBNZ XdDey4AQBR/0oniTNG9acNts+o0adEE3IpBnr3wA0i8HVET68ZiQIyXe69i19ZmBG1BT stGylv6IGUSXipFTv1WtFRz03EQp/SfKVp1rCd8BAzXYSlxuMNRfdrhS/hq8jnzjDSWp WEAWj46tRmKqpUw55O7I9NGt8tfng/ggvKTsxK8wq/W5fUS+rkc8Ig9/xBbnl+cC6vAE LDdQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKWM2RLgXf41MrvzW8nwG4lXq3V/Wj5HRZjN8k+sfDkdWt7S9mUM Lfe0YkW4A6qy3R7nCJSA9d2RSRXD6aM3qoofdN1wC/I9/9s= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set+bHya0eTjc8siwgS8alYTX1gX7l44w5pFFAHNr1TsroyyoEnfVUqRUQtl1UITIPthyxKFpx5PjsAc0xKCLe4w= X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:9491:b0:8ee:babc:d3f8 with SMTP id dm17-20020a170907949100b008eebabcd3f8mr6177720ejc.3.1677693097151; Wed, 01 Mar 2023 09:51:37 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <83pm9sfxfa.fsf@gnu.org> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.208.54; envelope-from=john.yates.sheets@gmail.com; helo=mail-ed1-f54.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -13 X-Spam_score: -1.4 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:303881 Archived-At: Earlier in this thread I mentioned that 'interface' is common in the vernacular of the C/C++ community. That was not to express a preference for the term 'interface', only no strong objection. My preference is for 'declaration', for which recent postings are making a good case.