From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: John Yates Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: etags failing with structure members Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2017 10:42:23 -0500 Message-ID: References: <58C25BCF.4010704@gmx.at> <831su5fpx7.fsf@gnu.org> <58C3D124.1070501@gmx.at> <834lz0dpjp.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1489246984 9143 195.159.176.226 (11 Mar 2017 15:43:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2017 15:43:04 +0000 (UTC) Cc: martin rudalics , Emacs developers To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Mar 11 16:42:59 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cmjAY-0001hY-6w for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 16:42:58 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43807 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cmjAc-0003Tm-O0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 10:43:02 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36991) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cmjA5-0003Te-22 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 10:42:30 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cmjA4-0008R9-B7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 10:42:29 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-lf0-x232.google.com ([2a00:1450:4010:c07::232]:32876) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cmjA2-0008OS-OC; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 10:42:26 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-lf0-x232.google.com with SMTP id a6so50595820lfa.0; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 07:42:24 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=sxF0nJX/jp2ZC+lHXUPu95SgneoQCKA+8OYqi4eBPCg=; b=B2hdaH/FRoYmPbiuKdH9bOIiKIOlqlG8U5G6nO/PMKFevm4W44t9tws6Ep9WeLUNba Y8wnXvcXTJudMmQtHD/bgZevbUywxhARrCEpzYOmEtA77v/TS+b8m69lOCbmEjWdK/7u yAEzMKA4tqc18glMdsYBPHarMc71q94b2xfan6RJle6pW0V8Ib4h8ww+Mjm6k5AObC1Z Rwy81tuZqduUH5OT2NU75gFe8b5AALSJ5UEvg56Zlb1YbGwgaUFaufZh3MX6kv0d4ldV RdD5Ul5VPs6FLIoPHNAtbgKcnaPIL+XOCUwC51XRVhEHdZCM1hnVJf7VEf6TytF4UPz1 SeCg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=sxF0nJX/jp2ZC+lHXUPu95SgneoQCKA+8OYqi4eBPCg=; b=RjIuAf60Xnluqf6rEr8KRrULr4Dgc7ZSelfO930NhHX/u2/YHm90vJOFIWeqsxnkFr L0Va6GfMDRwRdyCB3b8C8knZnC+4fdq9wkT/o6eyJSo/uPBZBQ+qN2g1Mvkid6HE0buz hIaOA6gi3P86nzgHAL85FbqnTCA2spLvRE+10z+8HKvH65ifuctQNe7WXB5H6OasmDES tBil3Nrjv+dK2nRjI6KK8YIZS8a4D0ir55Z/CjooOFcKH1r9srNxn77QW5ztvt51/+Rl Xz93rkFxfCLO7W8DNBe9a+GNzv6UFxvIoaPjXGkkL+lYokRPoppO2bCjaup4OYYEBYUf 5tzg== X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39mtqSO21xNupB3l7fd2FtI9Fra+kqs27OgilpLezqbaGaxKQigTcCemSKp4QDPEnYD8E3GBIJt6rAV6QQ== X-Received: by 10.46.7.1 with SMTP id 1mr7994041ljh.21.1489246943720; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 07:42:23 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.25.209.8 with HTTP; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 07:42:23 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <834lz0dpjp.fsf@gnu.org> X-Google-Sender-Auth: FJhyEV1SLtk2SSMIVZWiLHsbdD0 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:4010:c07::232 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:212907 Archived-At: On Sat, Mar 11, 2017 at 6:24 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > They look like a beginning of a K&R style function definition: For many contemporary codebases support for K&R is only a liability. Might it be possible to drop such support (at least optionally)? /john