From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Corwin Brust Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: recent change to yanking behavior of the clipboard Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2022 23:47:49 -0600 Message-ID: References: <20220205193944.836651.FMU2130669@unexploded-cow.prv.splode.com> <87o83kphri.fsf@yahoo.com> <87sfsv62nf.fsf@gnus.org> <87fsovmqd9.fsf@yahoo.com> <87leynz8th.fsf@gnus.org> <87leynjrpv.fsf@yahoo.com> <87h79bz6kb.fsf@gnus.org> <87a6f3jq02.fsf@yahoo.com> <87mtj3xqx1.fsf@gnus.org> <176C779C-0332-42D2-858D-22FB15F28E73@yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="35466"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Emacs developers To: Po Lu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 07 06:50:46 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nGwvF-00097T-EW for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 07 Feb 2022 06:50:45 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60114 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nGwvD-00061A-T9 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 07 Feb 2022 00:50:44 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:60122) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nGwsd-0004oX-2l for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Feb 2022 00:48:03 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-ej1-f41.google.com ([209.85.218.41]:46722) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nGwsb-0002Fb-JH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Feb 2022 00:48:02 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-ej1-f41.google.com with SMTP id o12so38653032eju.13 for ; Sun, 06 Feb 2022 21:48:01 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=p+/AIvo0ht6u3ceV09C3FWmHGOzR/8v2eq6uxc7ezqI=; b=Gr+VT9ibeLFWUiu091N8P16xxzmQ5x9gmviNe1D5qNuLwKO9d4YX1Exd+uEiINWc+P MyF4xlYNlG5/OBBOPKKjR15xo/kAB4R6POypWt/gRJJlaM4MDad/3CrC3511M9INaHzh D4CcROIGS5iDfK+qdf64WSkjmli3tXVlSCJbBwJDClT2U6hwFt0/XG+WGXymheF+vzfr 7Vs0rt/GmDOh5DxamW6SB+7YglssyzR7Lva+orISI1k4sM7+io4gqfcSK3RUFd+FIrZf kcI99QJIZUx39AKsu5XXzx8sx4s9JHTASEEj2YLo8V88e1SaTSJaGf/ptcBfs7N3TNje VhkA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530DhmaEIWvNdpuoOUkcNWVuVdStlazqTegFmeQpOncx4YlIHwub kizMD70IptG5tRjx7DyJJmLRsDe/y9514qfDjl15B/pT X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzawZn/NlSitIaCKRG8qNyXvVn/2Nnitgvt/SlZ5o4MKsjLTomnvGFD+FLe8kgAVIHIgCWL2swC2g9psUzO8ZY= X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:63ca:: with SMTP id u10mr6270861ejk.27.1644212879996; Sun, 06 Feb 2022 21:47:59 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.218.41; envelope-from=mplscorwin@gmail.com; helo=mail-ej1-f41.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -13 X-Spam_score: -1.4 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:286019 Archived-At: On Sun, Feb 6, 2022 at 11:30 PM Po Lu wrote: > > >FWIW, I don't think we are attempting to "wag the dog" here, in terms > >of influencing the X foundation, so much as to prevent changes in the > >behavior of Emacs that the users (at least, all who have chimed in > >here excluding you who made this change and presumably like it) > >prefer. > > FTR, I didn't make any change to which selection is used by default, and Noah is the only person who complained about the change that I did make. > > I was trying to discourage users from enabling `select-enable-primary', which Lars disagreed with. It was turned off by default in Emacs 21, where Emacs switched to the now-standard behaviour by default. I appreciate the clarification. Thank you Po