Thank you for the reply, Lars. On Sun, Oct 24, 2021, 13:42 Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: > Corwin Brust writes: > > > Are there design goals at stake here that bind-keys leaves aside? And, > > assuming there, would someone be so kind as to enumerate the design goals > > for a new keyboard binding layer? > > I'm not quite sure what you're asking Now that you ask, I wonderifmy thinkingis muddled, here. -- that Emacs should be pre-loaded > with bind-keys? > That sounds great to me Are there barriers or concerns? > As far as I know, bind-keys uses the same syntax that we're moving to. > Mainly, I'm interested in the goal of the present work. Perfect, to help me understand, would be to put that as a list of 'bullet point' objectives. I will have access to a personal computer tonight. I'll review this thread thoroughly. Likely I can then see the answers from that already once I do. Sorry if I've created undue noise -- and tia for any 'goals in summay' anyone troubles to make.