From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Marius Kjeldahl Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs Mac port Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2016 10:41:45 +0000 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1140861468ec4d053aa6b221 X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1471862562 10663 195.159.176.226 (22 Aug 2016 10:42:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2016 10:42:42 +0000 (UTC) To: YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu , emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Aug 22 12:42:37 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bbmge-0002Rs-M1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 12:42:36 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40636 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bbmgb-0004vj-Vl for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 06:42:34 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48484) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bbmg3-0004vd-KG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 06:42:00 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bbmg1-0004PG-AA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 06:41:58 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-lf0-x229.google.com ([2a00:1450:4010:c07::229]:34984) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bbmg0-0004Ot-Sl for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 06:41:57 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-lf0-x229.google.com with SMTP id f93so74533858lfi.2 for ; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 03:41:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=MP8CKEa2vkeOiOt9dnUVRdR2oD4gMG4azG9CTqXVxIU=; b=GWoztTF3sLtP9CVk/bWrSPhYUoWxnIGdMjAzHYNYnUtrd3n9eqYLYHn2BKURhK+VVG RcjGbOiu254JKkAMc5YXbIBnqBFQR3X6KI21g4tlAXiOlnwS+ts7k4xtQ5GFbjNUUrac vqeW95IiIdJPj/DSaeMQueCwrswV9klkiIbpG2XNCQrQdZaWny7W+mJHpNbjnFnrq1+q ji+0R2pSqplsb69PsYoEkoyklQKLMsZkh7jLMgN4Tsfe6QQJ0TzzLXid2XB8iEFPs04L tqsYhTwYCn8o3h8BdyXe9ZknsrESdfGp06+UxfyKIa98AB1ZRGstB4klCQzC1Lgt6HW9 PZNA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=MP8CKEa2vkeOiOt9dnUVRdR2oD4gMG4azG9CTqXVxIU=; b=f7syMi1KoCcq9hjrY9s2176Mby7hzsKwr6CfAzCoPX7s7JU2Yhn2wfuRM9lbbUtjLZ 30UHReA3d8xhGq6hvMiBKbzVq5Hwi7Y7FjoGn6t9jai8Y2nBinLW/2fDksZjEFdZdndq L5Ur3AVYPyziIi21YzoucYdm30qVvhwqKgq4xz2b5+wzc7uWo/d3CNd2uVwY92LVarJh /0zQP++qK8VN7XJhltvjzZ0hL+LjuzUsMARh4rYP/0wARIdqgxdSFI+JcG3N6Zp5sO3K hcL7jFpMlozTvsLE0Ju5ztKUDZY9n68KmfCpTRA+j95nGv61JTiJRQAEuX9pknTcqq6z XQzw== X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoout9hGpwewvGHHo0g1XCA/TS1eZrxtRsMVAqOFMR7uNxZnNxr2+R/Sp40R7V/zcF2mQ1HqKiD7CwUIFzEw== X-Received: by 10.25.211.15 with SMTP id k15mr4297340lfg.178.1471862515754; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 03:41:55 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:4010:c07::229 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:206744 Archived-At: --001a1140861468ec4d053aa6b221 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Following up on my own post, I now noticed that there was a setting in my .emacs file that selected the bold weighting. Why "stock" Emacs did not respect that setting and this "Mac port" did I have no idea. Changed the default weight to normal and now both versions have identical fonts. A curious mind might want to know why the "stock" Emacs OSX build does not respect the bold weight. The specific setting from my .emacs is: (custom-set-faces ;; custom-set-faces was added by Custom. ;; If you edit it by hand, you could mess it up, so be careful. ;; Your init file should contain only one such instance. ;; If there is more than one, they won't work right. '(default ((t (:stipple nil :inverse-video nil :box nil :strike-through nil :overline nil :underline nil :slant normal :weight normal :height 120 :width normal :family "Andale Mono"))))) Thanks, Marius K. On Mon, 22 Aug 2016 at 09:31 Marius Kjeldahl wrote: > Thanks, did a quick test and seems to work fine as usual. One noticeable > difference is that in your build, the fonts are weighted heavier. On my > iMac5K, your version looks bold compared to the regular version. I've > posted a link to screenshots below, although it's less visible in a > compressed image than on my actual screen. > > https://snag.gy/aiqFch.jpg > > Anyways, thanks! > > Marius K. > > On Mon, 22 Aug 2016 at 02:38 YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu < > mituharu@math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp> wrote: > >> The Mac port based on Emacs 25.1 release candidate 2 is now available from >> >> ftp://ftp.math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp/emacs/emacs-25.1-rc2-mac-5.91.tar.gz >> >> and Git repository is also available at >> >> https://bitbucket.org/mituharu/emacs-mac.git >> >> Get it from the "master" branch. The "work" branch is for bare >> development and not for release (candidate) versions. >> >> YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu >> mituharu@math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp >> >> ** Improvements >> >> *** Update emoji sequence data to version 4.0 draft. >> >> --001a1140861468ec4d053aa6b221 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Following up on my own post, I now noticed that there was = a setting in my .emacs file that selected the bold weighting. Why "sto= ck" Emacs did not respect that setting and this "Mac port" d= id I have no idea. Changed the default weight to normal and now both versio= ns have identical fonts. A curious mind might want to know why the "st= ock" Emacs OSX build does not respect the bold weight. The specific se= tting from my .emacs is:

(custom-set-faces
=C2=A0;; custom-set-faces was added by Custom.
=C2=A0;; If you = edit it by hand, you could mess it up, so be careful.
=C2=A0;; Yo= ur init file should contain only one such instance.
=C2=A0;; If t= here is more than one, they won't work right.
=C2=A0'(def= ault ((t (:stipple nil :inverse-video nil :box nil :strike-through nil :ove= rline nil :underline nil :slant normal :weight normal :height 120 :width no= rmal :family "Andale Mono")))))

Th= anks,

Marius K.

On Mon, 22 Aug 2016 at 09:31 Marius Kjeldahl <<= a href=3D"mailto:marius.kjeldahl@gmail.com">marius.kjeldahl@gmail.com&g= t; wrote:
Thanks, = did a quick test and seems to work fine as usual. One noticeable difference= is that in your build, the fonts are weighted heavier. On my iMac5K, your = version looks bold compared to the regular version. I've posted a link = to screenshots below, although it's less visible in a compressed image = than on my actual screen.

Anyways, thanks!

Marius K.
=
On Mon, 22 Aug 2016 at 02:3= 8 YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu <mituharu@math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp> wrote:
The Mac port based on Emacs 25.1 release candida= te 2 is now available from

=C2=A0 ftp://ftp.math.s.chiba-u.a= c.jp/emacs/emacs-25.1-rc2-mac-5.91.tar.gz

and Git repository is also available at

=C2=A0 https://bitbucket.org/mituharu/emacs-mac.git<= br>
Get it from the "master" branch.=C2=A0 The "work" branc= h is for bare
development and not for release (candidate) versions.

=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2= =A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0YAMAMOTO Mitsuha= ru
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2= =A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 mituharu@math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp

** Improvements

*** Update emoji sequence data to version 4.0 draft.

--001a1140861468ec4d053aa6b221--