Before this package reached my radar, I'd never even heard of plz. :-)

Regards, brickviking

On Thu, 2 Nov 2023 at 07:36, Augusto Stoffel <arstoffel@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Wed,  1 Nov 2023 at 09:14, Philip Kaludercic wrote:
>
> >>> I agree, from what I see this is just an implementation detail.  Plz is
> >>> a peculiar enough name as it is, it shouldn't be inherited by packages
> >>> that depend on it.  Or is there any reason why the package couldn't
> also
> >>> use url.el?
> >>
> >> The packages is really closely tied to plz's API, which by the way is a
> >> very nice one.
> >
> > But is this fact exposed to the user?
>
> Totally.  Perhaps if you had a look into plz you would appreciate this
> fact :-).
>
>