From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: brickviking Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Choice of bug tracker Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2023 22:44:01 +1200 Message-ID: References: <87il9kksqz.fsf@dfreeman.email> <87wmxj27fn.fsf@dfreeman.email> <831qfrptiq.fsf@gnu.org> <57429221-d9be-5791-e975-b3539905e2f6@gutov.dev> <83a5udlj47.fsf@gnu.org> <87a5udk1co.fsf@posteo.net> <835y51kslv.fsf@gnu.org> <7a82c524-1aa1-e755-e377-673ebb107a44@gutov.dev> <83r0nok8s4.fsf@gnu.org> <83ledwk4xi.fsf@gnu.org> <76ecf629-a41a-f6e4-f661-2ef926326d6c@gutov.dev> <83zg2cias7.fsf@gnu.org> <83pm37ie54.fsf@gnu.org> <831qfmhyx3.fsf@gnu.org> <87pm36kqlg.fsf@posteo.net> <87il8yuk6q.fsf@yahoo.com> <87ttsfts92.fsf@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000011cc6f060435bb3d" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="28569"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Aug 31 12:45:37 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qbfBA-0007EU-Br for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 31 Aug 2023 12:45:36 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qbfAM-0002xG-HK; Thu, 31 Aug 2023 06:44:46 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qbfAL-0002wt-MU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Aug 2023 06:44:45 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-lf1-x12a.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::12a]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qbfAJ-0003mP-5y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Aug 2023 06:44:45 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-lf1-x12a.google.com with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-4fe27849e6aso1287964e87.1 for ; Thu, 31 Aug 2023 03:44:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1693478679; x=1694083479; darn=gnu.org; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=9luVc09EG6wdsg+vju7ZYXJsqdiRYDTkiAIIvYNeMnY=; b=SoRLRXoFATw4BlHpxBIUF2WF5hkUmgNvUppij70zdJsGvJjwO9GvftWzfxV1X4grJn /rIBatGWIbY3fwJTqIrCGkkYblqzHulvfbnp+GAB3DJ6lk9rrg8xwEwPNCdhnzsYaHWU /tiWCLAtmd5ENlHHcSQ6FZA6r3yKJ+LaAibbRLgCVnUgr+1jRyKifkc5RgSBj+vmNkdi OvuIcOVubpaLNoq30wyAnibwMRU7p+UW6sfpp0NEcCPkRcYPZeLTI7ZAzQc0HIG3mgm2 vHrhzKcsdQ8l7Hh54jRZJkVZ+E18qedSZQ4sWpmrFARaQl/apo17Ft0TuUR7D417jJku ES3Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1693478679; x=1694083479; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=9luVc09EG6wdsg+vju7ZYXJsqdiRYDTkiAIIvYNeMnY=; b=ExL8JuHH6eplWPRGUijgyEBfBOCwDs06Lst9vV5gjz1Rv5Uwfc+uRzUXfZQHORAnT2 ojWT0hrV/dJffdSNMWUTc4YZz3JVZvax48i48eQPcmkr4vC+1KFu+GWqIgcliXFZM0yk jGij9hDQKd4bovcg4f4XYwL+fqxayGaynHXB5e+9cuEsWV9qaRF0Rgv81UIKzqauu1ot stiKgvhX2Mze7wrzCsmrnHxn9vSgsb8380oNo/SsEiGAvCqhPL99sOIRGha8B628cQsH JnemRBuuoBlmdOlzJ6OgRjonxaXDkbS3M+LyNABYvYIdMzjSDMrwlziQZZLYJpd0yASg J4IA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyXAzG4xWWWeM9aHYpXSKUUvM8bqCrzdwaUXCFYtkmjtBYTzIwt CcjxtEx1YcK5Dsri7Zes0pL3LLndufzkZwQr3Qm4cCrowJE= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFKfZTcDv0G0BwfIaIVRV91ohzfmur6CVNNkCyhakKn237vbysv5XftoJxe4f98+h2HrrvmA8RX/++gLmDqrtk= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:9855:0:b0:2bc:c28c:a2b5 with SMTP id e21-20020a2e9855000000b002bcc28ca2b5mr3438547ljj.51.1693478678546; Thu, 31 Aug 2023 03:44:38 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87ttsfts92.fsf@localhost> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::12a; envelope-from=brickviking@gmail.com; helo=mail-lf1-x12a.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:309617 Archived-At: --00000000000011cc6f060435bb3d Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Thu, 31 Aug 2023 at 22:34, Ihor Radchenko wrote: > Po Lu writes: > > > Philip Kaludercic writes: > > > >> We count the fact that everything can everything can be done via Email > >> as a feature, right? > > > > I think so. I hope we will also consider the capacity for separate > > threads of discussion within an individual bug report a feature. > > But isn't it discouraged in debbugs? > > -- > Ihor Radchenko // yantar92, > Org mode contributor, > Learn more about Org mode at . > Support Org development at , > or support my work at > > What if there was a hypothetical bug report that actually had a multiple number of things to address, but was only being reported under the original "bug" that the user reported on? That'd still be a good reason to be able to discuss #bugnum, #bugnum-feature1, #bugnum-feature2 and so on. I'm assuming that this is what debbugs is "discouraging"? Regards, brickviking --00000000000011cc6f060435bb3d Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Thu, 31 Aug 2023 at 22:34, Ihor Radchenko <yantar92@posteo.net> wrote:
Po Lu <lua= ngruo@yahoo.com> writes:

> Philip Kaludercic <philipk@posteo.net> writes:
>
>> We count the fact that everything can everything can be done via E= mail
>> as a feature, right?
>
> I think so.=C2=A0 I hope we will also consider the capacity for separa= te
> threads of discussion within an individual bug report a feature.

But isn't it discouraged in debbugs?

--
Ihor Radchenko // yantar92,
Org mode contributor,
Learn more about Org mode at <https://orgmode.org/>.
Support Org development at <https://liberapay.com/org-mode>,=
or support my work at <https://liberapay.com/yantar92>


What if there was a h= ypothetical bug report that actually had a multiple number of things to add= ress, but was only being reported under the original "bug" that t= he user reported on? That'd still be a good reason to be able to discus= s #bugnum, #bugnum-feature1, #bugnum-feature2 and so on. I'm assuming t= hat this is what debbugs is "discouraging"?

Regards, brick= viking
=C2=A0
--00000000000011cc6f060435bb3d--