From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dani Moncayo Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Two strange messages while building Emacs on MS-Windows Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 21:58:28 +0100 Message-ID: References: <83mwxpmtp6.fsf@gnu.org> <83fw3hm0nn.fsf@gnu.org> <83k3srdh3d.fsf@gnu.org> <838v96dgyd.fsf@gnu.org> <8338zecu4i.fsf@gnu.org> <50C6E75A.80807@dancol.org> <50C79BC6.8020309@dancol.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1355259517 16131 80.91.229.3 (11 Dec 2012 20:58:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 20:58:37 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Daniel Colascione Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 11 21:58:51 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TiWuf-0000Lo-BW for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 21:58:49 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36838 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TiWuS-0007O3-Ot for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 15:58:36 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:56662) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TiWuP-0007H4-HY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 15:58:34 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TiWuN-0007pk-UV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 15:58:33 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-ob0-f169.google.com ([209.85.214.169]:56865) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TiWuL-0007pM-VR; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 15:58:30 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-ob0-f169.google.com with SMTP id v19so4073726obq.0 for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 12:58:29 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=JIuZhfdT21qmYK2yyRq2YhiL3AWgQidDpSBBt6zLPco=; b=r6Qugn0e41c1C8USGi+1yd4fVXRtvdOsBWlZcVaFFfpQ82GiY3kb9EbORdUraLSjPl y3WaBlsO0y0xCMMicwRP8Cxbl2/pCV8MNZTuSj3Pa9fxgJfY9w70eKBKkF4Sr68YwJ+n Ypg7Rc+xokIme+pjaNr08HrxhxMuqXI4tyngEs7us8cwA3PgTZFpBrS/FU2qFVHlEvpi +zLyxdN3EEH1R5BSSyVzS+pkgTzgLSja6rbzHBPhQtYifqr++AGUG7Gohbn7xlCQKo9W JxDZwsUL7EdT5oSaTu21PoIbvN0E2T6MeKpx+jEoCDZ/yyU+jM8vfS/KBVoqmDAzF0L5 ih2A== Original-Received: by 10.60.23.232 with SMTP id p8mr10067008oef.53.1355259509074; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 12:58:29 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.60.11.39 with HTTP; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 12:58:28 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <50C79BC6.8020309@dancol.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 209.85.214.169 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:155484 Archived-At: >>>> $ time /c/emacs/trunk/bin/emacs --batch --eval '(message "Hello")' >>>> Hello >>>> >>>> real 0m1.189s >>> >>> Can you try cp /c/emacs/trunk/bin/emacs.exe /c/emacs/trunk/bin/emacs2.exe && >>> time /c/emacs/trunk/bin/emacs2.exe? Can you try running the time command a few >>> times? >> >> I guess you mean to execute >> time /c/emacs/trunk/bin/emacs2 --batch --eval '(message "Hello")' >> >> The result is the same as invoking "emacs" instead of "emacs2", i.e., >> between 145 and 200 ms. >> > > What do you mean? The emacs run above took 1189ms. I only say what I see. Apparently, yesterday it took indeed much longer to start. No idea why. -- Dani Moncayo