From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dani Moncayo Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Two strange messages while building Emacs on MS-Windows Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2012 09:43:22 +0100 Message-ID: References: <83mwxpmtp6.fsf@gnu.org> <83fw3hm0nn.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1354956211 16626 80.91.229.3 (8 Dec 2012 08:43:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2012 08:43:31 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Dec 08 09:43:42 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ThG0b-0002g5-PQ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 08 Dec 2012 09:43:41 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40670 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ThG0P-0004H9-G0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 08 Dec 2012 03:43:29 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:41106) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ThG0M-0004Ft-Cj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Dec 2012 03:43:27 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ThG0L-0006j7-0R for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Dec 2012 03:43:26 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-ob0-f169.google.com ([209.85.214.169]:38362) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ThG0J-0006im-J4; Sat, 08 Dec 2012 03:43:23 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-ob0-f169.google.com with SMTP id v19so858032obq.0 for ; Sat, 08 Dec 2012 00:43:22 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=s8pLU9r6qTYFhEaQjWSrpTKUZKIjFEs2/1TTXVHnv8E=; b=FhL+qrWx6pmYhnBHMqAKejKAeaQVQgC5OJRm5FVULMFkL7hlSnjF2AoCjMfAsLQEMN XBSq7QpYTxiXPmjmCW97bn+N++oeEEkm600bfaPU66u/BIR+D4Ub4T/5QWHg3F+r4sxl uEw1W1WJyhr+Qmzr4iGMdH6ndZF9edydhYYbZgXgOQZq9ujJV1Eqnuxrl6rSKgkzrtLs T2HOwl5NpdiwhkaQdy/YGA4PPznoUJM29FXwQleoqYqdZsJa4gZT1LklSUbb+YEjN0Z6 X0H4Fc9aceubNPAxOVINb/FENaMzFT4ocsSpk5sdux6tAYkx7Ykuq8qVAgM+8UwU7qlF uAEw== Original-Received: by 10.60.31.205 with SMTP id c13mr4458447oei.135.1354956202876; Sat, 08 Dec 2012 00:43:22 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.60.11.39 with HTTP; Sat, 8 Dec 2012 00:43:22 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <83fw3hm0nn.fsf@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 209.85.214.169 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:155359 Archived-At: >> > How much time does it take you to bootstrap, btw? And on what >> > machine? >> >> I'm not sure. About 30 min, I think. I'll time it next time. > > You didn't say what machine was that. Sorry. The processor is an Intel Core i5-2410M @ 2.30GHz. > If it's anywhere near core i7, > you can slash these times by a factor of 3, if you use a recent CVS > build of GNU Make which supports job-server style parallel builds on > Windows. Just type "make -j8 bootstrap" instead of just "make bootstrap". > ("-j8" because the core i7 CPU has the equivalent of 6.5 processing > units, and the recommendation for Make is to use a number slightly > larger than that.) I'll try a parallel build. BTW, a plain "-j" option seem to be a good choice; according to the GNU Make manual it will dynamically determine how many parallel recipes can be run: `-j [JOBS]' `--jobs[=JOBS]' Specifies the number of recipes (jobs) to run simultaneously. With no argument, `make' runs as many recipes simultaneously as possible. If there is more than one `-j' option, the last one is effective. *Note Parallel Execution: Parallel, for more information on how recipes are run. Note that this option is ignored on MS-DOS. -- Dani Moncayo