From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dani Moncayo Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Two strange messages while building Emacs on MS-Windows Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 22:01:11 +0100 Message-ID: References: <83mwxpmtp6.fsf@gnu.org> <83fw3hm0nn.fsf@gnu.org> <83k3srdh3d.fsf@gnu.org> <838v96dgyd.fsf@gnu.org> <8338zecu4i.fsf@gnu.org> <50C6E75A.80807@dancol.org> <50C79BC6.8020309@dancol.org> <50C79EBB.6050002@dancol.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1355259696 17614 80.91.229.3 (11 Dec 2012 21:01:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 21:01:36 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Daniel Colascione Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 11 22:01:49 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TiWxU-000381-Bu for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 22:01:44 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39348 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TiWxH-0000cf-Pv for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 16:01:31 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:57565) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TiWx8-0000Zn-JM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 16:01:30 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TiWx2-0000bL-Ie for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 16:01:22 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-ob0-f169.google.com ([209.85.214.169]:42893) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TiWwy-0000aC-7E; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 16:01:12 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-ob0-f169.google.com with SMTP id v19so4076483obq.0 for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 13:01:11 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=xchy90SeZqM0Fs7HFmdW9j1tE4llXJjiFSt09JW6jIw=; b=owwNIfHdmcYhWZpVEY4IdaZfVSiXx7kOPgUTeeIsUMtRgb33+XwM04ayF/j3BAy+80 A5YwSGPlsy3sH8u8xFlLG2Pg3p+cvocLsBRN57BTgvSKRgC5EVk4sxYcP/kJuXssgWC4 fI4ZLHlQXr8Fm7+PAalT5U9EcqMNilo6Qkw4GD1F7ltlHa77WU/0rHQQqjLEaPOcWkq9 /H2CBvq/7TIWAktI9Elxrc/+xjv5gNnQUFVS11zl3FaQBFawoV3y9myj+YH4wqAma5oY WPenrTT9azlv1vO+ws2Fl0HZHUvKuqH1+gNxOFA93TFoIDHz/X0cUNcD1Wj/p0tX1o17 7XQA== Original-Received: by 10.182.146.107 with SMTP id tb11mr9966879obb.30.1355259671617; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 13:01:11 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.60.11.39 with HTTP; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 13:01:11 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <50C79EBB.6050002@dancol.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 209.85.214.169 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:155487 Archived-At: >> I only say what I see. Apparently, yesterday it took indeed much >> longer to start. No idea why. > > Have you rebooted in the interim without rebuilding that emacs binary? I have rebooted, but this emacs binary is different, since I've bootstrapped about an hour ago. -- Dani Moncayo