From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dani Moncayo Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: "Official" binary of Emacs-24.4 for MS-Windows Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2014 11:31:18 +0200 Message-ID: References: <83tx2t5uo9.fsf@gnu.org> <83siid5qgj.fsf@gnu.org> <83mw8l5kr9.fsf@gnu.org> <83d29g64u4.fsf@gnu.org> <834mus601u.fsf@gnu.org> <83y4s44i6e.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1414229497 6982 80.91.229.3 (25 Oct 2014 09:31:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2014 09:31:37 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs development discussions To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Oct 25 11:31:26 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Xhxgz-0002ha-V1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 25 Oct 2014 11:31:26 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52744 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xhxgz-0004x1-ID for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 25 Oct 2014 05:31:25 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40842) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xhxgv-0004wh-Up for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Oct 2014 05:31:22 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xhxgv-00051O-4f for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Oct 2014 05:31:21 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wg0-x22a.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c00::22a]:60558) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xhxgt-00050y-SN; Sat, 25 Oct 2014 05:31:20 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wg0-f42.google.com with SMTP id k14so604391wgh.25 for ; Sat, 25 Oct 2014 02:31:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=AApkn8y85m1I3asqCWh0TDPMxSEOF5NxFFMqL6aCEUc=; b=puqsrbLGzI7TcFudbaGVUUDOl9Qbbe0XoKqwNvRAzexpVMS+yfoV6p+kuA9mcm+vas 2HoYdBcTivOTkt8CrbhzcmcmtRq4jSbEJ7/ht6vqfWP3pgUgYaLeF95zxYW8omEaJ/CC ufRphbqgrzFV/GJMjUkKZR+C5reqCqJrfxvM6024/b5xIsmP2pjOxBxxuRRpCNy9dn0X zfrkUnjhj1+zHHkLsCioQr/pRmrycHmDXOIBhB7FWIeFPsQDGAOr2jvYrVPorYkr67+D ncb7ZJQpsYXZ2A4l+JqOceVr527xtLW15vUS6/bTFWTctjmJxJLmm5UXG4QvFHcGKL/I IO2A== X-Received: by 10.180.90.230 with SMTP id bz6mr9466196wib.67.1414229478945; Sat, 25 Oct 2014 02:31:18 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.217.152.70 with HTTP; Sat, 25 Oct 2014 02:31:18 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83y4s44i6e.fsf@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:400c:c00::22a X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:175821 Archived-At: >> Ok, no parentheses. But I think that the system configuration, >> since is not part of the program version (is just a build-time >> setting), should should go after "-bin", not before: >> >> emacs-24.4-bin-i686-pc-mingw32.zip >> >> Do you agree? > > We are down to nitpicking, but... Why after? Because, reading the filename from left to right, it seemed more natural to me to say first that "this is a binary distribution", and then its system configuration than the other way around. But yes, there isn't a compelling reason for choosing one format above the other. -- Dani Moncayo