From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dani Moncayo Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: "Official" binary of Emacs-24.4 for MS-Windows Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2014 15:27:01 +0200 Message-ID: References: <83tx2t5uo9.fsf@gnu.org> <83siid5qgj.fsf@gnu.org> <83mw8l5kr9.fsf@gnu.org> <83d29g64u4.fsf@gnu.org> <834mus601u.fsf@gnu.org> <83y4s44i6e.fsf@gnu.org> <83vbn84hi2.fsf@gnu.org> <83tx2s4bzf.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1414243639 13941 80.91.229.3 (25 Oct 2014 13:27:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2014 13:27:19 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs development discussions To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Oct 25 15:27:10 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Xi1N8-0001mS-64 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 25 Oct 2014 15:27:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53495 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xi1N7-0002uQ-Oq for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 25 Oct 2014 09:27:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39943) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xi1N4-0002t3-DU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Oct 2014 09:27:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xi1N3-0006pX-Eo for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Oct 2014 09:27:06 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wg0-x229.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c00::229]:40369) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xi1N0-0006mm-O0; Sat, 25 Oct 2014 09:27:02 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wg0-f41.google.com with SMTP id b13so2815507wgh.24 for ; Sat, 25 Oct 2014 06:27:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=fTSH80uOyOhRaZWTqirgRYB4uEe+wvA1szYa0pPpgMQ=; b=r0MO5BAe2iqs9OlgEXIckNOCwEMs/j5sHXwWqYSs0H1NNml3DskxL5vP6g8V0yfdbH I2JSl4ALNSYf1p7kRKtC5uEpeoDGEMjE/nUK6jZkOm0GyfGo8dK2Q6K4Bh6t3/0k31TJ 1deGIEARf1yCGfuOXZajiqc7TeUaYWt6S99QMqj06kBcvQVCe6F8RTy37cK8G905iGra Pbcl63lWUIO8rYiridUOjAj4QrH/Zid6GQ5i8Y1kA5wp+3DfOAWG/yf+tke08qV5RxPY mPKsXkMcv5q2jmB9nRUKAr8EvU7Ayflt0HdHhz+gqAnB0GZ9/y9jvcXQ+Ws3UKUjYPdx yTTg== X-Received: by 10.194.90.210 with SMTP id by18mr11965111wjb.34.1414243621785; Sat, 25 Oct 2014 06:27:01 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.217.152.70 with HTTP; Sat, 25 Oct 2014 06:27:01 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83tx2s4bzf.fsf@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:400c:c00::229 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:175827 Archived-At: >> I've tried (for the first time) the "make install-strip" target from a >> trunk build, and I've noticed something strange: the size of the >> resulting stripped "emacs.exe" is ~ 16 MB, whereas the same file for >> the 24.4 release (also stripped) is ~ 9 MB. >> >> Such big difference is strange, isn't it? > > I think it's expected. You will see the same 7MB difference between > the unstripped src/emacs.exe in the emacs-24 branch vs the trunk. Between unstripped executables, the difference is close to 10 MB, but ok, this seems expected. >> Also, I've noticed this suspicious errors in the output of "make >> install-strip", which don't appear in a "make install" from the same >> build: > > Looks like some redirection snafu: for some reason, install-info is > called with arguments taken from Make messages that announce entering > and leaving directories. Maybe it comes from this line: > >> info_misc=`MAKELEVEL=0 make -s -C doc/misc echo-info`; \ > > Looks like MAKELEVEL=0 doesn't work with your Make. Try adding the > "--no-print-directory" switch to the "make" command, and see if that > helps. Yes, it helps. The install-info errors are gone with that switch. > This sounds like bug #13962, but since we now require GNU Make on the > trunk, I think it's OK to use --no-print-directory instead of the > MAKELEVEL=0 trick. Fine with me. Thank you. -- Dani Moncayo