From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dani Moncayo Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Two strange messages while building Emacs on MS-Windows Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 22:58:33 +0100 Message-ID: References: <83mwxpmtp6.fsf@gnu.org> <83fw3hm0nn.fsf@gnu.org> <83k3srdh3d.fsf@gnu.org> <838v96dgyd.fsf@gnu.org> <8338zecu4i.fsf@gnu.org> <83vcc9aa4a.fsf@gnu.org> <83sj7c8fkn.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1355263122 16958 80.91.229.3 (11 Dec 2012 21:58:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 21:58:42 +0000 (UTC) Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 11 22:58:56 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TiXqo-0006Rp-QE for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 22:58:54 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49006 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TiXqc-0002CL-7K for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 16:58:42 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:37313) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TiXqY-0002Av-05 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 16:58:39 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TiXqW-00008N-CX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 16:58:37 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-ob0-f169.google.com ([209.85.214.169]:47519) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TiXqU-00007W-Uh; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 16:58:35 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-ob0-f169.google.com with SMTP id v19so4132246obq.0 for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 13:58:33 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=3942ayAYJuQfcdPo8EJ1mkfozQrVVG57sKhC929bvFc=; b=acp4i6IvfaO2b7+octlqF/iTKA/Tm4iBekr0/xAhwJLBV0WRE54GDezjLzdOuq6S1j /clVsUoFw8RcWFtcOualzFkM3gtstVLt7xFj1eglj8wRFtNpCrr/LTXo8VK3bmSkTItl ArwXLSfrr522FAgRbm3cWsPtpmzno+dnNQyTJmN1oSUN4sHOpaMon0IssIANYBCzt306 /UaRaIutWC5VNndEpH+04T6ntq7a218192bZ/xXvBDNBhJZdDDpxWbPGZ1k9ueG49rJt vaMWsPj0vBq5QKpaj9Yd7QayqaLzjg15+yIriVcjRMun2fnrLpSsyYrcLH1qdkB517zx JyYw== Original-Received: by 10.60.172.143 with SMTP id bc15mr10076940oec.46.1355263113767; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 13:58:33 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.60.11.39 with HTTP; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 13:58:33 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <83sj7c8fkn.fsf@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 209.85.214.169 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:155490 Archived-At: >> > Try this: >> > >> > cd nt >> > touch ../src/config.h >> > make -j6 >> > >> > and time the last command. >> >> 0:51 > > As expected. So, if compiling the C sources takes 1 min and compiling > the Lisp files takes 6.5 min, how come the bootstrap takes 15 min? > What else takes 7.5 min? I don't know. It seems that a bootstrap is not equivalent to the sum of the two commands we've measured. >> I don't know what's the best way to measure execution time from a >> cmd.exe shell. Thanks. -- Dani Moncayo