From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dani Moncayo Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Two strange messages while building Emacs on MS-Windows Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2012 21:17:04 +0100 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1354911435 30189 80.91.229.3 (7 Dec 2012 20:17:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2012 20:17:15 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs development discussions To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Dec 07 21:17:28 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Th4MN-0007A4-Eg for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 07 Dec 2012 21:17:23 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36806 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Th4MB-0002j4-8Y for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 07 Dec 2012 15:17:11 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:51373) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Th4M8-0002im-Gp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Dec 2012 15:17:09 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Th4M7-0007PU-EY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Dec 2012 15:17:08 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-ob0-f169.google.com ([209.85.214.169]:37887) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Th4M5-0007Mk-OS; Fri, 07 Dec 2012 15:17:05 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-ob0-f169.google.com with SMTP id v19so490107obq.0 for ; Fri, 07 Dec 2012 12:17:05 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=AOFV9AOk12nXIPmbY2q3S81y1leNbIsyyw1bHlUbcBk=; b=XXxpbuoUWvemokUmp0pec4SBQyGIxuze8jAQ6yOuDPUUIcMuulSarNiFDoO3P4sP7g PSgc29v+0Jogl/ZgA8bmyy0aK3/7BhkALiNtpCTKKVAvb9rhaHjHCrWAsmLi8B15zz01 TrnXFPpYrQYD3+OtoD8oE5Rf8x3WTZnkNX3D3K9WkUJB9Knq0RKyQR0L3mpAYLdy4oDO BLHir8X5ZV1T0z7ntjh0+C7BtZ59vgaPRorngHafDW4fJC2oBHYVyl2i3MzJSJFaTXcm jOODakcnzpcgBzZ0eiaJ2bkj87sG1byg+gkoos/RZjr5lAi2a/OtI2vrtYiuUFUgOa5c E7rw== Original-Received: by 10.182.92.70 with SMTP id ck6mr3872449obb.46.1354911425019; Fri, 07 Dec 2012 12:17:05 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.60.11.39 with HTTP; Fri, 7 Dec 2012 12:17:04 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 209.85.214.169 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:155345 Archived-At: >> I guess you did not remove the old .elc files; ie did not bootstrap. > > PS if you are going to be providing pre-built binaries for general > consumption, I hope you will make them via bootstrap, else there could > be subtle problems from time to time. I see. Thank you Glenn. I was following Eli's advice for doing incremental builds (http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=12128#20), since bootstrapping takes a lot more time. But, why the makefiles don't take care all necessary recompilations? Being forced to do a full bootstrap is too bad. Is not there a better solution for this? -- Dani Moncayo