From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Paul Michael Reilly Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Git transition workflow Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2014 07:36:36 -0400 Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c2f682b51969050058f740 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1407757020 3576 80.91.229.3 (11 Aug 2014 11:37:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2014 11:37:00 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Aug 11 13:36:53 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XGnuG-0005gU-VB for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 11 Aug 2014 13:36:53 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35119 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XGnuG-0008I9-I7 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 11 Aug 2014 07:36:52 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51355) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XGnu7-0008Hk-Uj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Aug 2014 07:36:50 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XGnu1-0000PP-G6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Aug 2014 07:36:43 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-ob0-f182.google.com ([209.85.214.182]:40407) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XGnu1-0000PE-CA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Aug 2014 07:36:37 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-ob0-f182.google.com with SMTP id wm4so5996402obc.27 for ; Mon, 11 Aug 2014 04:36:36 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=/yxIPBoA2ShZqbZRR9sWvTBBRj8JoMdcuaZWp5iyw/c=; b=jLt4xm6+9MD8UT9NJ3hmMhmHs6etoU56q8mHtr97olN4BVMsLicQX7/vIcBRaEaJYl OYujb5+zIGsP8OAlzLrOID2ruMZZXocBJr1hHYJG/7gghUI4+0/HxFOPayfxa8G7qdBg izFP/gqDyfik9OLs5aaKnkagzGqte+Q1cUyqG1NKa151S4qH06ZLRNb5P7HOJ94Ru4KT 0ojccCinXwLrh3ut8Bcb+HajuFXk6wKeT+yfiRM4FMdGHIzPsdo0Edp/7soD8tHkiYB5 i63rUfNQnRfs2Hn6iX9oLla88rjGk3VXlLoH2uKkrnbr3RtiR95WgHAFsTCx4f4yePlQ cFMA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkmXoQxYiK/wWsCrm8vhQFGNOqTHfjx0zrYY6875/xLyN/ZUpUzh2+1HGlkdC6cCs3aQRaH X-Received: by 10.182.213.7 with SMTP id no7mr49292530obc.39.1407756996509; Mon, 11 Aug 2014 04:36:36 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.76.105.105 with HTTP; Mon, 11 Aug 2014 04:36:36 -0700 (PDT) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 209.85.214.182 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:173568 Archived-At: --001a11c2f682b51969050058f740 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 When we switched to using Bazaar, there was quite a bit of email traffic on workflow: how best to use bzr when developing Emacs. I realize that there are already some workflows for using git with mirrors but I would be shocked if there wasn't some varied opinions on how best to use git after Eric pushes that magic button. Am I wrong, and it is intuitively obvious how we are going to deal with git and branches, rebasing, reviews, etc? That a consensus already exists? -pmr --001a11c2f682b51969050058f740 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
When we switched to using Bazaar, there was quite a bit of= email traffic on workflow: how best to use bzr when developing Emacs. =C2= =A0I realize that there are already some workflows for using git with mirro= rs but I would be shocked if there wasn't some varied opinions on how b= est to use git after Eric pushes that magic button. =C2=A0Am I wrong, and i= t is intuitively obvious how we are going to deal with git and branches, re= basing, reviews, etc? =C2=A0That a consensus already exists?

-pmr
--001a11c2f682b51969050058f740--