From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Paul Michael Reilly Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Git transition workflow Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 00:09:05 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87r40migqm.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <20140812025830.GA15317@thyrsus.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c2a1d41ca25d050066d5f0 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1407816565 1855 80.91.229.3 (12 Aug 2014 04:09:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 04:09:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: "Stephen J. Turnbull" , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eric Raymond Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Aug 12 06:09:20 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XH3Og-000652-Vj for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 12 Aug 2014 06:09:19 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39035 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XH3Og-0004ly-CR for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 12 Aug 2014 00:09:18 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57268) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XH3OZ-0004kA-5e for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Aug 2014 00:09:15 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XH3OU-00059E-QS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Aug 2014 00:09:11 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-oi0-f44.google.com ([209.85.218.44]:63143) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XH3OU-000592-Lt for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Aug 2014 00:09:06 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-oi0-f44.google.com with SMTP id x69so6226100oia.17 for ; Mon, 11 Aug 2014 21:09:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=EPzq7k0tAfYfTPpdV0H7qFwQhZG/gx+x+3QJNUYELu4=; b=IEAEJf1kOyze5lUr2Ll79CJCuQHOho7+ITg1jkVkTPRiBSNpBqaPu0eVHa1UCFKXz7 sHfpQOqpuUmJIu9OuQs3PiXjFJWRfXqgUkDlvNaqDMTS/rWuO792DhdIrBdrAQgj3iOr UdhJUGkS3skwac1sMEHpvG3CYDRaztNYJN7MB7umybn31U4fFsXm2isud26KtYgbVu4T ABkJqrD/kE3FrcR09re680Pt5SfYCVv7MZrRxSangC9zjvpU8OeZGOr+eCtAocEwqgdw taVW9upD5wQrCFcN1GyqKXJqi1MG+koYaIEsuR+esmxLzU5JOMQmBeG95MWVNlagNgmo T6zw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlzfIXmT8BIq43y3tkJbevxmNcEPXNkwOUj5kQKfrpCrv8feLRxHx00NURBdFiRv4M8t4qF X-Received: by 10.182.24.101 with SMTP id t5mr1876909obf.31.1407816545633; Mon, 11 Aug 2014 21:09:05 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.76.105.105 with HTTP; Mon, 11 Aug 2014 21:09:05 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20140812025830.GA15317@thyrsus.com> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 209.85.218.44 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:173590 Archived-At: --001a11c2a1d41ca25d050066d5f0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 10:58 PM, Eric S. Raymond wrote: > Stephen J. Turnbull : > > Paul Michael Reilly writes: > > > > > Am I wrong, and it is intuitively obvious how we are going to deal > > > with git and branches, rebasing, reviews, etc? > > > > Having observed several of these transitions, including Emacs's > > CVS->Bazaar transition, it's really not a problem as long as the git > > fans accept that several major contributors just want a CVS-like > > workflow, and git commands that implement that workflow are explained > > in straightforward terms. > > Furthermore, the workflow documentation is already up on the wiki. > That's one of the first things I did. > And would the URL for this workflow documentation be: http://www.emacswiki.org/emacs-es/GitForEmacsDevs ? -pmr --001a11c2a1d41ca25d050066d5f0 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On M= on, Aug 11, 2014 at 10:58 PM, Eric S. Raymond <esr@thyrsus.com> wrote:
Stephen J. Turnbull <stephen@xemacs.org>:
> Paul Michael Reilly writes:
>
> =C2=A0> Am I wrong, and it is intuitively obvious how we are going = to deal
> =C2=A0> with git and branches, rebasing, reviews, etc?
>
> Having observed several of these transitions, including Emacs's > CVS->Bazaar transition, it's really not a problem as long as th= e git
> fans accept that several major contributors just want a CVS-like
> workflow, and git commands that implement that workflow are explained<= br> > in straightforward terms.

Furthermore, the workflow documentation is already up on the wiki. That's one of the first things I did.

And would the URL for this workflow documentation be: http://www.emacswiki.org/emacs-= es/GitForEmacsDevs ?

-pmr

--001a11c2a1d41ca25d050066d5f0--