On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 10:58 PM, Eric S. Raymond <esr@thyrsus.com> wrote:

> Stephen J. Turnbull <stephen@xemacs.org>:
> > Paul Michael Reilly writes:
> >
> >  > Am I wrong, and it is intuitively obvious how we are going to deal
> >  > with git and branches, rebasing, reviews, etc?
> >
> > Having observed several of these transitions, including Emacs's
> > CVS->Bazaar transition, it's really not a problem as long as the git
> > fans accept that several major contributors just want a CVS-like
> > workflow, and git commands that implement that workflow are explained
> > in straightforward terms.
>
> Furthermore, the workflow documentation is already up on the wiki.
> That's one of the first things I did.
>

And would the URL for this workflow documentation be:
http://www.emacswiki.org/emacs-es/GitForEmacsDevs ?

-pmr