From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Philippe Vaucher Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Testing of the portable dumper branch Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 18:10:32 +0100 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114404c0d2837205442e3cc7 X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1482340270 26568 195.159.176.226 (21 Dec 2016 17:11:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 17:11:10 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs developers To: ravi desai Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 21 18:11:07 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cJkPy-0006L5-AJ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 18:11:06 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58137 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cJkQ2-0005Rr-Km for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 12:11:10 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60134) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cJkPx-0005RZ-0Q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 12:11:06 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cJkPv-0000qh-Ua for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 12:11:04 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-vk0-x22a.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400c:c05::22a]:34642) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cJkPv-0000qB-PD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 12:11:03 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-vk0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id x186so152776904vkd.1 for ; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 09:11:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=tTo2tq7QCF5GfGDBK7mPvhSblwEw6D5hilZ/t0hpa1g=; b=WlBHEr2y/8J+HCT14/dEmfJ3l7FtFvF7kRPSDjNEHAGEsI/5TGv6P64KISdrhtttIY 6gw9gwMON7Ew03d7/cwZ/1ddyFjYGjcuigB8JPn5RlxJIyySg1tCoDlue8Urm1ynOlzj wz0p3dH2V+9NiM7jKxEXpn4bOPmhAEnRM2arWyK5B9/VSWJp5WOvD2VqEtYOkYjT9PBk 8NYZPprZlmBrABCGVO1SucTisNlWTGsrRkbpJAZD6nLY6tRp23iyYJO1BO7ATrLpSIi6 RfRVAGJQaBh2HScX4agrA+/PAPjRbJeQk1fP/XZLnWJx6TWsrIdWEnxo7SG5WDGc9/j1 D9Zg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=tTo2tq7QCF5GfGDBK7mPvhSblwEw6D5hilZ/t0hpa1g=; b=CoroogAlkB2JRizyJ4EVcCFjjZrH5G4BHHb1wV1Ui1xu2EQCUBzKCg7UdK/tBLDuFy 54QEOCb9vH4hi+7ErVy3kZvaatJWK/HXC1OSjUca+Fe67BOE8FDFd3KAUlmE3rG2zGxD stfrFltfucG/UpJISZ4f3yMz9v1l/0C9w7iVoiD5yNHMmqpiqYAbqOZnV7/UifvKXXbw 1jwfSHw1E4dS6wqqiR03zy3iGhxC8Ys87fJwPOy9ePv+rcZ8n09/8QHSEKksXI/Ag6/3 RQx86gCLDzraOW5osLx2DhQx/uPPQCNIJPRnX3cKG1znYGfjDFWsm/G2oRFux/jJBHcs LKgw== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXJHaCr9cn6Vuz3YMElWDUydG15gVzrAWZVvH/VTfxXTKt32n1gkV8QbbkGy7ameXSy0hXiFXhD7vPJMEw== X-Received: by 10.31.172.74 with SMTP id v71mr2198079vke.150.1482340263164; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 09:11:03 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.103.125.149 with HTTP; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 09:10:32 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:400c:c05::22a X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:210697 Archived-At: --001a114404c0d2837205442e3cc7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > > As a side-note, what do we usually do about old branches? There are > branches > on that page saying "13 years ago". Do we delete them or just leave them > hanging? > My guess is that most people would be ok to get rid of them, but don't care enough to argue about it when faced with the inevitable arguments like "but it does not hurt to keep them", "it might prove useful one day" or "it has historical value" :-) My take on this is would be to do a giant cleanup (delete all irrelevant branches), but archive these beforehand somewhere "just in case" to be on the safe side. Philippe --001a114404c0d2837205442e3cc7 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
As a side-note, what do we usually do about old= branches? There are branches=C2=A0
on that page saying "= ;13 years ago".=C2=A0 Do we delete them or just leave them
hanging= ?

My guess is that mo= st people would be ok to get rid of them, but don't care enough to argu= e about it when faced with the inevitable arguments like "but it does = not hurt to keep them", "it might prove useful one day" or &= quot;it has historical value" :-)

=
My take on this is would be to do a giant = cleanup (delete all irrelevant branches), but archive these beforehand some= where "just in case" to be on the safe side.

Philippe
--001a114404c0d2837205442e3cc7--