From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Philippe Vaucher Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Drop the Copyright Assignment requirement for Emacs Date: Tue, 19 May 2020 12:26:15 +0200 Message-ID: References: <9mmFgzvrBwjt_n_VJyaJdXINraNi5HsGpwq-0MLeKiJA7kG2BQA4uywrzjyz7lpRS0OZDpjEi8lspOKYUA7P_QsODsDew_8nbH960G55fmY=@protonmail.com> <83pnbegsvm.fsf@gnu.org> <547c9116-c1c3-8563-4aee-c62aa2302861@yandex.ru> <838shybfdo.fsf@gnu.org> <3f79ff6e-2471-fa6d-08ff-682afd504eca@yandex.ru> <83v9l29yz3.fsf@gnu.org> <87o8qujs0p.fsf@randomsample> <83lfly9vvs.fsf@gnu.org> <835zd29rjb.fsf@gnu.org> <3c558381-f584-a2e5-972e-007221347f16@yandex.ru> <87tv0c2pxc.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="50385"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Richard Stallman , deng@randomsample.de, Emacs developers , Stefan Monnier , Dmitry Gutov , Eli Zaretskii To: =?UTF-8?B?Sm/Do28gVMOhdm9yYQ==?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue May 19 12:27:15 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jazSs-000D0D-Ro for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 19 May 2020 12:27:14 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51760 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jazSr-0000yg-UD for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 19 May 2020 06:27:13 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:38394) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jazSO-0000WZ-Ik for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 19 May 2020 06:26:44 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-lf1-x12c.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::12c]:33066) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jazSN-00022x-R0; Tue, 19 May 2020 06:26:44 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-lf1-x12c.google.com with SMTP id z22so10790853lfd.0; Tue, 19 May 2020 03:26:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=yb9e25yJyUG3HsI1tgFHeQuyEml9lVwbESzWqRAyJ2Q=; b=Ttag5DJOIQLKptYa4MG3ukYSmteZSm2s5NlN51O0haiagdJYNkGQXUsAgjYsDajHpv dBakA6oKSPIeKyeg/29mIctgoC96TpprRmAa29nTX1kiDFxpawW+kotu5Ds77trdiTSQ lcnB0rzlWghbIuff1mCFsgF01UJ1KmYPxZ3esNcjJNgeR8mVARPdvXo8rv7Pg4XO3+rZ c+jEj8OCS9CM8v8e51XhHAOZ4uW+9FV1cAUV6A1SCXYrNL2MfWE+nwfXeMAH/vV0j7fU 9c6znoAOx++pTyb6iV/rljHLOqWPilN7MC8zl6REJ2T2tS4Gj5uOx5fV3VuNDD+G+8Fv jsBQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=yb9e25yJyUG3HsI1tgFHeQuyEml9lVwbESzWqRAyJ2Q=; b=ZHkwE51NSWhFwPWeey3lBcZHPv8kZ47kYuzmrMk5f7FKm2RGPR5+rhCtTsVquc9pKs 7i/OQ6skHDF6KLPcONryKC0SamNdF3B7MbAzDIWfySwllteYrwHKlTI7vKJBFE4sHV+i CwiLfe4Hz9NHP4qlR+z5ecrNBoxFYNZDuLFxGZa1HiXSWRa97cxmp5StxA3EegK7cw7P gQuRdTWud8VmaAp3TavGFcgYnNwIQHhk4dpIST/jB2wnBhgTLWD92ixuw5JQOWiWeezI GRCX50zZl/DH6zUNBxNiw4EbvVL0+q8kpuk9BKbWTXSD64gCs6/tZUY/Hhz+kHOKh2/W IExQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531L96D2ZAwGV7S6rxMvBYSs51onzsKwtPkWc5f64TzdrPD2ndMR XKhJi6IIXzMOBgx0lYOXy1FGoMqFohg6UYXP9N4= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwYXCfyTODoIYIb3pkbwZx6PGyEHeqLCvwULNSrI+ML8bhVPyZAAMwWT660SUnXmvKzjRNfyl8hYN3BOHIxzjk= X-Received: by 2002:a19:6a10:: with SMTP id u16mr14793831lfu.105.1589884001614; Tue, 19 May 2020 03:26:41 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::12c; envelope-from=philippe.vaucher@gmail.com; helo=mail-lf1-x12c.google.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: No matching host in p0f cache. That's all we know. X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:250900 Archived-At: > Online it's more simple: identification is done before accessing the > form (double authentication, email validation, whatever), then once > you access the form there's only the confirmation-step remaining. I'll let you use your imagination as to how add even more identification along this process, maybe by adding identification after you confirmed the contract, invalidating it if you cannot reconfirm it's you. Philippe