From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Philippe Vaucher Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Renaming some functions Date: Tue, 5 May 2020 09:18:53 +0200 Message-ID: References: <83zhaoo2j1.fsf@gnu.org> <83k11rojyi.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="81004"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Eli Zaretskii , Stefan Monnier , Emacs developers To: Richard Stallman Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue May 05 09:20:01 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jVrs0-000Kud-PT for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 05 May 2020 09:20:00 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55174 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jVrrz-000207-Rv for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 05 May 2020 03:19:59 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:47056) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jVrrP-0001RN-GL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 May 2020 03:19:24 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-lf1-x12c.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::12c]:41546) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jVrrO-0005XU-1D; Tue, 05 May 2020 03:19:22 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-lf1-x12c.google.com with SMTP id a9so492023lfb.8; Tue, 05 May 2020 00:19:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=/yYP1Xc/1BkuCKpeGFaYauuR/jV+Rj7D2xIsKYZOYPE=; b=oL2WPVEfTYrbaS55PZLgeRWQkIWvy25m2de+hydqL/YGetG/offb4FQGDezZ3eNmPO 539S0t8wdAqUSN/s6mZoIP1N4qxFkeRew9yC3w0aBM/YF1QrW5Avl4C3OqrVKkxd/OsF yFsxbdq13/fRPMLsV0unkkrjmEf+PC/e+WYUkP4tMUxAiaKrvoJxEoFFDo2jsyqreB99 nhv5OjMCPyIltzQjqc0ZqaxCzYZ/WeDZ7OzaDKCK+C3+mbABoRl9BoOkxvB4E1NFRdQK N7j5+9/z57VDGXTHpyFjkckPa6wz4rKymOn9I5yn7N3005eZw7XQWLZtUqKcbYBSJCel CIcA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=/yYP1Xc/1BkuCKpeGFaYauuR/jV+Rj7D2xIsKYZOYPE=; b=BxdM2x2xy3Bn/EJawV6w9/8l7LarVNulRp8GHPEHI7J/D5pwpPrDAklo8YXmjmm/5V hl4jOX3MDQjXR2MTlw2XR/yyU3is/0Jt3cTvOgp3/dMErP0UHidD0icQZ+PnKXBQeOTi hNKCTsDykEoQCcHoGPGshuvwjb+WB7pikNecW8rOGBIVT1sycZ6R3rqvIqnLREcc+F4Y xm5wuIHz75NuKWSJ0d9C2jHoO3gVGfzW4jfdMvxW1ulmDXZKleGcJ6b2+xUmv61izePa AU4dSntuusiGxsmvyJTA6hS2wxOgfqLO7gAAOOKYmsBzouQc3WLcTe1EXN18Ekp4WbHh JMkA== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0Puaed/JVqfGq8nUzrCBLMTi1Jf47NoqCGEaSTjVp+BbjAoqEUj9K rSEsa2FWasPtGfJj7MRJZNxcQUxID1yT5QMpHr33FTO8 X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypJz9hBg0B0lS2R5LE6EoSD76gD5vMeS5IJVACuDhLIwOBJ5ouICQWrT+nXlLZBXSnxemidDFAucWLLJUiM4mhQ= X-Received: by 2002:ac2:4248:: with SMTP id m8mr715194lfl.211.1588663159289; Tue, 05 May 2020 00:19:19 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::12c; envelope-from=philippe.vaucher@gmail.com; helo=mail-lf1-x12c.google.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: No matching host in p0f cache. That's all we know. X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:248945 Archived-At: > >> >> multibyte-string-p => string-multibyte-p > > > > However, based on what Richard wrote, maybe we should have both of > > > these functions ;-) > > I did not suggest that we should define both names. > What I said was that each name goes naturally with a different > meaning. I think implementing either one of them is sufficient. The current "multibyte-" prefix contains only a few functions. Maybe it's too small to warrant its own category?