From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Philippe Vaucher Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: dash.el [was: Re: Imports / inclusion of s.el into Emacs] Date: Mon, 11 May 2020 11:44:21 +0200 Message-ID: References: <0c88192c-3c33-46ed-95cb-b4c6928016e3@default> <87wo5mc04t.fsf@fastmail.fm> <87d07cwtb1.fsf@fastmail.fm> <87ftc67sae.fsf@fastmail.fm> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="53820"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Richard Stallman , Emacs developers To: Joost Kremers Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon May 11 11:45:41 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jY50H-000Dvg-7L for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 11 May 2020 11:45:41 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50586 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jY50G-0006i9-6m for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 11 May 2020 05:45:40 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:41838) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jY4zT-00053p-DY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 May 2020 05:44:51 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-lf1-x12c.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::12c]:33764) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jY4zS-0002Ho-MQ; Mon, 11 May 2020 05:44:51 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-lf1-x12c.google.com with SMTP id z22so6957090lfd.0; Mon, 11 May 2020 02:44:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=ryYichmodpVoFVT3JMy3lRhkoRRXY944qBdQYIwad/4=; b=nZxOr6UjJaGGS97PEKOALUeqvLN9aZVGTjTbIE6eHkE9a/etn5b+dJr2sLGBA2GFHo SyF4oJ816UDVyLPeemFdJCIYT4SByn9WYK3DSlwS6GW+CjaDskiJBAXApM7C0Ytv2F2w dGX9W/qFdg+TmrwwgFAqO3oWuvriGT47PB0AbkcqMnqgy4wsdVLMqSJKbj4cesY3r9C4 KWdjyTsZg33tdOfUEXj3XTayH85xaRsmplP8X2qEDaMVFyBcJfJ0pqkeHAM8Ae1AweA8 0JYBNRduFgaSWv2BL1+vdw/EDgB1f1JlLq8fGJbdhZla5G5mZQGwO7id8ca9+rfyQ5NK RrJg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ryYichmodpVoFVT3JMy3lRhkoRRXY944qBdQYIwad/4=; b=WZXamL/YAryixPZ0NnhfEkXsZewQcyca7ETogMI+ohK1csDBvz7IdB7Zw+NsISWnQF X4WYmCPqEghPziWrSHjJZKhqyyEtul7JnNfkHdQzJClBgbYn59YrAKMCyTNQh+ex5Mhi aV2sytirjrRbKQ26OVm/l3pih7HhYukmDgBVmbNyapK44ArN9MsoBAuqNItB67n+sP3O 0X4Jtz7BTleou5PhMbZSadotabIJQVveO44HFv14KNZJa1Pss6uomfjhjzAnQMAErBPw aRftIkWp/fa7+UNpiyXTHoZnwonwk/S6M7iCjwZBeZ5OTam3ZPO4hSpOUwXiy3pkguED Vczg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531Cx8Si21AnI2unf6I2getGD56cYf1QJ5/E+e48WyslaLrNXeyC H3+Q50uKr1fZxvaHkIVDrAVqJbCyEz20STgNsmrHIHTw X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwFEia58nHf6BrVgY/QIhFcbCzpg1Vdic6TEISd7MNlWBSuWCotVzc+hU9LR+YXJyLKiNXr+g6ioRs+9QD3P6Q= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:53a:: with SMTP id o26mr10357233lfc.111.1589190288103; Mon, 11 May 2020 02:44:48 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87ftc67sae.fsf@fastmail.fm> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::12c; envelope-from=philippe.vaucher@gmail.com; helo=mail-lf1-x12c.google.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: No matching host in p0f cache. That's all we know. X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:249770 Archived-At: > > The preference is a matter of taste. If you have a taste for > > Lisp, the former > > seems totally natural. If you don't, maybe it seems strange. > > IMHO it's not a matter of having a taste for Lisp or finding > `(print (eval (read)))` 'natural' or not. I find it perfectly > natural, but there are cases where it becomes difficult to read, > especially when you nest not two or three but five or six function > calls and/or when each function call has additional arguments, > which may be function calls themselves. > > You can use `let*` to lay out such structures in a way that make > them more readable. `->` and `->>` are even better than `let*` in > this particular case, because you don't need the intermediate > names. Thanks for explaining my example better than I did. I couldn't find a way to make people understand it but I think you did.