From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Philippe Vaucher Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Testing of the portable dumper branch Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2017 17:02:22 +0200 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=94eb2c11c96003be12054cd145ca X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1491836639 3408 195.159.176.226 (10 Apr 2017 15:03:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2017 15:03:59 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs developers To: Daniel Colascione Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Apr 10 17:03:55 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cxarB-0000mj-T5 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 10 Apr 2017 17:03:54 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34831 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cxarH-00017k-SE for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 10 Apr 2017 11:03:59 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60954) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cxaqG-00017N-Jt for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Apr 2017 11:03:00 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cxaqF-0000cK-JB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Apr 2017 11:02:56 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-ua0-x235.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400c:c08::235]:34879) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cxaqF-0000bm-FD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Apr 2017 11:02:55 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-ua0-x235.google.com with SMTP id 49so40330687uau.2 for ; Mon, 10 Apr 2017 08:02:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Gyec+rw0YMC6DclXNzrOOqr8ve2scnWdj/P7eaAy5RM=; b=Bp/odr8eHcLfe1JzeE4gsUAGx36ExLTQrLS5Tma/A39rKzpdJuf5buKeNZV8XxoWX/ w2RJXLgjUL5ch2S7fFW/G/pJniePCX8ce65JtbrjnTQ/LPqoVA0/Qd3yEj6F2s7iIgBz OZ8etylaXhQMlxJWOBTgWI9EChNKVLLpPLafn/RHXWN52ALq464d+aWjKsYIISiiTUaX PhOuQj/sST3g64MVfX1jzXiuuWsT0I/+dcdRjLOorZ/9S2wUcyI36omQ4mUUvZCIPMqI xGOSGC2Y9JangkwrdDHgoNB11EHfpewK03J2QAYYW8+qqktYZyum4Y3LNAyO51qVE5fP l4bQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Gyec+rw0YMC6DclXNzrOOqr8ve2scnWdj/P7eaAy5RM=; b=Y0HHu7C1yoAkUa8ZA7MGyzUUr5AdMGHpuOY9nywyXlkDHiXghczEp3Yvij+ynrVMv8 1raa1wJ0DBXizzLNPiBv3tZzbLKIj7vt0Cw72EONLAzKNttc1g2dq/JztQhgj8zGjxAg hrd4YHWz1ZXPmmcz4ZjI3hGFDnENOP1gJs/V5NDJI1R8cgIKgBmhLyl+lqviVNmOvv+C +u00DfOAA+Eyy+7xwWvapmwu2X07UV4USTC8RCl9XEXFr2RH15Z/2dYJEokzT/ufcETz rxg7zvRNlUynuGaqDwtcE81KmPBIP+cZEnnSDSPcDezPKcasuYvY6345I65Y5TtdEPKc GtEw== X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H0Ils+vrUj9utNw16SbfdSfwxEy2il3RZVX2opxrovljSbT8diH6YcyRNHXRNON3GYtnWLnndklEYNvCg== X-Received: by 10.176.69.161 with SMTP id u30mr23945155uau.69.1491836573300; Mon, 10 Apr 2017 08:02:53 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.103.126.73 with HTTP; Mon, 10 Apr 2017 08:02:22 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:400c:c08::235 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:213834 Archived-At: --94eb2c11c96003be12054cd145ca Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > On Tue, Dec 20 2016, John Wiegley wrote: > > Has anyone had a chance to play around with the portable dumper branch, > and to > > review the changes? I'd love to hear some thoughts. > > I've found that pdumper does awful things to weak hash tables restored > from dump. I'm fixing that bug --- I'll push when that bit works. > ...So, any news? Or maybe are you waiting on the result of the "big elc file" approach before deciding to continue with the portable dumper idea? I mean, with all the discussions the portable dumper generated it's kind of a shame not to be able to test it, or at least look at the current implementation in some repo/branch, even if it's broken at the moment. Philippe --94eb2c11c96003be12054cd145ca Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

=
On Tue, Dec 20 2016, John Wiegley wrot= e:
> Has anyone had a chance to play around with the portable dumper branch= , and to
> review the changes?=C2=A0 I'd love to hear some thoughts.

I've found that pdumper does awful things to weak hash tables re= stored
from dump.=C2=A0 I'm fixing that bug --- I'll push when that bit wo= rks.

...So, any news?

Or maybe are you waiting on the result of the "big elc file&qu= ot; approach before deciding to continue with the portable dumper idea?

I mean, with all the discussions the portable dumper = generated it's kind of a shame not to be able to test it, or at least l= ook at the current implementation in some repo/branch, even if it's bro= ken at the moment.

Philippe
--94eb2c11c96003be12054cd145ca--