From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Paul Pogonyshev Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: suppressable byte compilation warnings and cconv.el Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2016 17:44:55 +0200 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1460648708 29320 80.91.229.3 (14 Apr 2016 15:45:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2016 15:45:08 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Apr 14 17:45:07 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aqjS7-0003Tp-9i for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 14 Apr 2016 17:45:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42018 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aqjS3-00046I-7g for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 14 Apr 2016 11:45:03 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38391) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aqjRx-000426-4v for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Apr 2016 11:44:57 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aqjRw-0000AC-6d for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Apr 2016 11:44:57 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-ob0-x235.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4003:c01::235]:33988) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aqjRv-0000A1-VO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Apr 2016 11:44:56 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-ob0-x235.google.com with SMTP id bg3so50643836obb.1 for ; Thu, 14 Apr 2016 08:44:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc; bh=jVjjMf6/VWEfPinBpBaOrn/F4v+8JL6PpOg0MVknjos=; b=vUMfrgDEGqupE9S+5gS+1MU2fP4rmUmFy9jDCcA0CSUURjrJx+GKHAnXm2nBWQf46I RjJ6C078zFfyNyloF11dJDeMMyPteVCLmYYHLDiLzxEzKAZkgUtgrlPOpUMW2cx5iXM2 fe8T2S/ZlLIrUJ09qb7K7ea+624Av/U5OpIA9BzaakLWGvhD2k3FT+swEscFhyS1mC8U 1oyouzeHO98M9iKMPY4eaiDHZrWPny82nNRfs24930H8aq1odiNM4Ylj7OIyZa/2wv1W Dywu51qDWy67PMVP4OL2KYxpzrTck6Qky7JL5Zq4KLgkmKAdiWj/RdViHMDIQIpnV/lb Nxvg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=jVjjMf6/VWEfPinBpBaOrn/F4v+8JL6PpOg0MVknjos=; b=ZpH+L8P02DmNYGLbGG6Dj/JK9kIfHPcDlJJirs2KtUi2HR6310ylIf6zPu55M0ClcL Ge9sCkXZ9XljC4sJDEXXFgWjfutEWpy4dHmplQtucQIR6oxu7iWNt5u6CCSPmoAgTjZc nNS+C/smACshJqPw7PqoZrGLCw6AoX5mlpHDVX04M/3TaHyAyYdrdn3qqxCUqOxuaOJC Agt2liOTO44nAeTU+6V6zyMMHFED4CwR8ug2U6DJ6/66v5GbBLs8ePkbWcTaecYHncaH E+hT6RPU+HLNKakOpsWAHlX3YID2G62p8SRycnBpvUdED2oTUseweG30uf7Y2qW55Lg3 IOCg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FX7I3xO5Lchgc7QscQ8JA2ULsFQ+2meOGtJzjiOOmMe8osz/ewoR31uX5t2k0rJAJKn0sj7xqSH8PNA6g== X-Received: by 10.60.173.210 with SMTP id bm18mr1183997oec.30.1460648695432; Thu, 14 Apr 2016 08:44:55 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.202.197.148 with HTTP; Thu, 14 Apr 2016 08:44:55 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:4003:c01::235 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:202908 Archived-At: > For those cases where you don't actually know whether it's used or not > (most typically this happens in macros), you can instead use the > `ignore' function OK, good enough for my usecase. Thank you. Paul On 14 April 2016 at 14:04, Stefan Monnier wrote: >> To clarify why I want it. I have some procedurally generated >> functions, which I byte-compile after generation. > > For those cases where you don't actually know whether it's used or not > (most typically this happens in macros), you can instead use the > `ignore' function: > > (defun foo (arg1 arg2) > (ignore arg1 arg2) > ...) > > > -- Stefan