From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Paul Pogonyshev <pogonyshev@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Edebug: avoid messages on 'f' command
Date: Sat, 7 May 2016 13:55:28 +0200
Message-ID: <CAG7BpapG8j6qAkBgU9NGTgh4ZwcEXKaxjf2t7dw7zjM-jyjyWg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAG7BpapVWrxhCiFKKMhoZO0_cnyOPRy-HaFa93qUByW3SRtszQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<20160505131010.GC1950@acm.fritz.box>
	<CAG7Bpapk43Z_ZEqZrpMod06-j6seCbbNB4X3mPemZCbXutYu1Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<20160507065745.GA8759@acm.fritz.box>
NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1462622138 13149 80.91.229.3 (7 May 2016 11:55:38 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 7 May 2016 11:55:38 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat May 07 13:55:37 2016
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17])
	by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1az0pc-0006Jj-4w
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 07 May 2016 13:55:36 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33988 helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1az0pa-0007ud-Ml
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 07 May 2016 07:55:34 -0400
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58905)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pogonyshev@gmail.com>) id 1az0pX-0007r7-7f
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 07 May 2016 07:55:32 -0400
Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pogonyshev@gmail.com>) id 1az0pW-0000hR-3O
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 07 May 2016 07:55:30 -0400
Original-Received: from mail-oi0-x234.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4003:c06::234]:33723)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pogonyshev@gmail.com>) id 1az0pV-0000hK-Un
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 07 May 2016 07:55:30 -0400
Original-Received: by mail-oi0-x234.google.com with SMTP id v145so165916175oie.0
	for <emacs-devel@gnu.org>; Sat, 07 May 2016 04:55:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:cc; bh=fTDYH9jwMoMocTQq4wvmbdVZvnnVwJfZP08yB+MeLmg=;
	b=ivGfPvzLJ34e8BGz0+o3m5UmLV9OhJa7MRxA9ENfnk54Z4BcElOSvLgMZVuyQnNGy0
	5Bow3Y4OtlpD3Nd2Vpa9N87/QnajO2ciFmdKkvXyWg3lxAw7uhZqVc7QN5aZwkx/dzfE
	07YnmTc0FSyHwGaZN4LYJGVlUF6eksOJ+t/iPiLBMu39NFPW1Ol+xK901KuWydKeoLmu
	tYIGYU7TL4pq+gyuibBi3KW3MxSJemc/70cDsklX7X3dMN1ZgfCyRLcAHfCAQ39XtplG
	3nEMinNxvLaexF5/bRc8RqfMhZIoHe+/xVACIC6v3MUbZh5yu0Vvbb8CcMTIGM2aRgPt
	DcbQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
	h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
	:message-id:subject:from:to:cc;
	bh=fTDYH9jwMoMocTQq4wvmbdVZvnnVwJfZP08yB+MeLmg=;
	b=eTBY9nptTlCoxepPq1vIyOtZ/JmsMc5DiIqfWkWlEO6zazcn0PjklJ1dt4qTXZIK8+
	SjQxHoDKSC3OBFDgpVeMy1TCxrhLQUaI12benfaa9dZEh5luK/m8a/WryIa5eziYPIwl
	Brrtj451B3iDgXg/y7dVOccJ0l7W994rsLEwQXQU0J2/D4ZL3CaEGEjOG8csqZfOFcCO
	M5OPgogvNj5sY6yxdYTGdaOfkfPyeO68aBGvmpOEDJg0DMD9+GJOsCB+L71K4+Lai2BY
	R5vN77LAgqFmjB+lDukKFWj0e9XXlnJHuDpIpTyz0hT0VmIwd4a04oWieGK4TpiwP5c3
	20lA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FVtubLO8V9q/IR5Dim0YvzQcMbZE/Wdv0yvNsYmZOqF5t7UrcqlsEUHpJoA5M7G3M224TZUxDoD9cnHJA==
X-Received: by 10.157.5.74 with SMTP id 68mr12621490otw.174.1462622128830;
	Sat, 07 May 2016 04:55:28 -0700 (PDT)
Original-Received: by 10.202.235.82 with HTTP; Sat, 7 May 2016 04:55:28 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20160507065745.GA8759@acm.fritz.box>
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic]
X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:4003:c06::234
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:203664
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/203664>

On 7 May 2016 at 08:57, Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de> wrote:
> One thing's puzzling me - who would ever want that one second of "Break"
> in the echo area?  It's annoying, and it's scarcely useful information.
> Maybe I should just have ripped out that bit of code entirely.

I wouldn't mind. And judging by the quite poor usability of Edebug in
general, I think others wouldn't care.

Paul