From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kaushal Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: =?UTF-8?B?UmU6IEMteCA4IHNob3J0aGFuZHMgZm9yIOKJpCBhbmQg4oml?= Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 14:57:44 +0000 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0158bf74bf522a0515cf9925 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1431356285 30431 80.91.229.3 (11 May 2015 14:58:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 14:58:05 +0000 (UTC) Cc: eggert@cs.ucla.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon May 11 16:58:05 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Yrp9g-0005xo-7y for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 11 May 2015 16:58:04 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38013 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yrp9f-0004Vv-Ik for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 11 May 2015 10:58:03 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38411) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yrp9R-0004Vd-QW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 May 2015 10:57:50 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yrp9N-0001D9-Uj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 May 2015 10:57:49 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-yh0-x232.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4002:c01::232]:34308) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yrp9N-0001Cx-RM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 May 2015 10:57:45 -0400 Original-Received: by yhw29 with SMTP id 29so36919372yhw.1 for ; Mon, 11 May 2015 07:57:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=wnl6hKSxNTgjJD5CclVa2dGiVKEfGOII+jJou23H+KM=; b=xEv+14iezfyTnVRzH7jFVAJVOTBDQa4+lB+FqkwmIbgNWp8mYs8VVFr4stESacj63U vVLGokvjkz1cgc48tmQsFCymBjCindizD2Mh0SU5JYWxnlDa5E4nz5WYVc/mnwUBsFJM 7+86Xf0+JpMb7WNQN4+CkHqXmzAnW0DkmOE2OM/K7VkrSQK6ePEIao+aSZvJN4B/ej62 eDR2Dw7ztzyIub0bUs7bG1qj3tP/Y9dXMS4dOxdbqoYsI75elqVCa5oX5Xle0TP/PAhp 478YbgMvnh4s7Mwdmcnpe+/3O4Cr1Vua2Gqr6oLgyZgTxlnVt2FsFSUQ0S6NcNWjA24s LTlw== X-Received: by 10.236.21.175 with SMTP id r35mr10450634yhr.166.1431356265417; Mon, 11 May 2015 07:57:45 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:4002:c01::232 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:186407 Archived-At: --089e0158bf74bf522a0515cf9925 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thanks. I personally never needed to use =C2=BB. But for someone already us= ing that, the ">>" binding is pretty intuitive (and same applies to "<<"). I'd vote for that change to happen so that we can have ">=3D" and "<=3D" bindings, and others beginning with "<" and ">" in future. On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 10:53 AM Stefan Monnier wrote: > >> ("_<" . [?=E2=89=A4]) > >> ("_>" . [?=E2=89=A5]) > >> Can the bindings be changed to these: > >> ("<=3D" . [?=E2=89=A4]) > >> (">=3D" . [?=E2=89=A5]) > > FWIW, I agree. > > > ">" is already bound to =C2=BB > > "<" is already boudn to =C2=AB > > ">>" and "<<" would seem to be better choices. > The shorter `C-x <' used so far made sense when we restricted C-x 8 to > something like Latin-1, but if we want to extend coverage, I don't think > we can afford such short bindings. > > > Stefan > --089e0158bf74bf522a0515cf9925 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Thanks. I personally never needed to use=C2=A0=C2=BB.=C2=A0But for someone already using that, the &= quot;>>" binding is pretty intuitive (and same applies to "= <<").=C2=A0

I'd vote for = that change to happen so that we can have ">=3D" and "<= ;=3D" bindings, and others beginning with "<" and "&= gt;" in future.

O= n Mon, May 11, 2015 at 10:53 AM Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> wrote:
>>=C2=A0 =C2=A0("_<" . [?=E2=89=A4])<= br> >>=C2=A0 =C2=A0("_>" . [?=E2=89=A5])
>> Can the bindings be changed to these:
>>=C2=A0 =C2=A0("<=3D" . [?=E2=89=A4])
>>=C2=A0 =C2=A0(">=3D" . [?=E2=89=A5])

FWIW, I agree.

> ">" is already bound to =C2=BB
> "<" is already boudn to =C2=AB

">>" and "<<" would seem to be better choic= es.
The shorter `C-x <' used so far made sense when we restricted C-x 8 = to
something like Latin-1, but if we want to extend coverage, I don't thin= k
we can afford such short bindings.


=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Stefan
--089e0158bf74bf522a0515cf9925--