>> ("_<" . [?≤])
>> ("_>" . [?≥])
>> Can the bindings be changed to these:
>> ("<=" . [?≤])
>> (">=" . [?≥])
FWIW, I agree.
> ">" is already bound to »
> "<" is already boudn to «
">>" and "<<" would seem to be better choices.
The shorter `C-x <' used so far made sense when we restricted C-x 8 to
something like Latin-1, but if we want to extend coverage, I don't think
we can afford such short bindings.
Stefan