From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kaushal Modi Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: RE: [PATCH] Fix (letrec ((ignore))) Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2015 17:19:19 -0500 Message-ID: References: <20151211161116.GA8923@apertron.net> <20151213121315.GA2680@acm.fritz.box> <89886369-1d66-4129-9290-56888a41661c@default> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c1641aae8b6e0526cef25b X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1450045176 32516 80.91.229.3 (13 Dec 2015 22:19:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2015 22:19:36 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Artur Malabarba , Alan Mackenzie , Zack Piper , =?UTF-8?Q?Aur=C3=A9lien_Aptel?= , Emacs developers To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Dec 13 23:19:35 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1a8EzP-0007y4-Ak for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 13 Dec 2015 23:19:35 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56780 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a8EzO-0002I8-G4 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 13 Dec 2015 17:19:34 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37187) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a8EzB-0002Ht-ND for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Dec 2015 17:19:22 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a8EzA-0006AL-Q9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Dec 2015 17:19:21 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-qg0-x236.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400d:c04::236]:33666) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a8EzA-0006A6-Mu for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Dec 2015 17:19:20 -0500 Original-Received: by qgev16 with SMTP id v16so15732473qge.0 for ; Sun, 13 Dec 2015 14:19:20 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=wkH2L0KFuHBFLQwXd/C0nQCzydbydljqsgg27tJ0YjI=; b=vrJVQfIQnLzlgv+x2//d14J9ZmFn8QsAh8qR6JxNlvJLBMDDMlPlPlDJl3EQjrZfPB AzPnRWz6E5KO/5JY7i8uzLu9drAyVG7ofw6W8ilNfIXga0A0j+MwFcFy/kCBDXzU6nvN cc9c2sGtZMFG98JTVl7QwsTfwxgHMZ3/aD6eVYx39sB1XxTt26asfqCL920vcELZRwjW vs4V3DCT/cQDAp/wfxVBkduLuzo+pRYBs4TI+t5nUR58dSgtrS3EmTNAEpufwe0KLx8a yX766Pb6f8NlZPThs7lLM1Hki27Kp2MafctG/9GVzvlheASleHaVA+e4DnmQno6ScEZg r6dQ== X-Received: by 10.140.101.233 with SMTP id u96mr38200720qge.70.1450045160186; Sun, 13 Dec 2015 14:19:20 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.55.143.7 with HTTP; Sun, 13 Dec 2015 14:19:19 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.55.143.7 with HTTP; Sun, 13 Dec 2015 14:19:19 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <89886369-1d66-4129-9290-56888a41661c@default> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:400d:c04::236 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:196224 Archived-At: --001a11c1641aae8b6e0526cef25b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > Some coders use the convention that showing the nil initial > value explicitly indicates that this is the initialization, > whereas `(foo)' indicates that the `let' body will perform > the (real, significant) initialization. The suggestion was to consider the below form as invalid. (letrec ((SOMEVAR1) (SOMEVAR2) ..) ..) Not the below: (letrec (SOMEVAR1 SOMEVAR2 ..) ..) --001a11c1641aae8b6e0526cef25b Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

> Some coders use the convention that showing the nil ini= tial
> value explicitly indicates that this is the initialization,
> whereas `(foo)' indicates that the `let' body will perform
> the (real, significant) initialization.

The suggestion was to consider the below form as invalid.

(letrec ((SOMEVAR1)
=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 (SOMEVAR2) ..) ..)

Not the below:

(letrec (SOMEVAR1
=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 SOMEVAR2 ..) ..)

--001a11c1641aae8b6e0526cef25b--