From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kaushal Modi Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs logo proposal Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 16:15:25 -0400 Message-ID: References: <876121mjdw.fsf@petton.fr> <87r3kpl3xp.fsf@gmail.com> <5E6AD325-C652-4C83-A3D8-744BB0467DD6@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113b9626781cc905228eeef1 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1445372256 3927 80.91.229.3 (20 Oct 2015 20:17:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 20:17:36 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Jay Belanger , emacs-devel To: Chris Van Dusen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 20 22:17:34 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZodLU-000600-8b for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 20 Oct 2015 22:17:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47882 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZodLU-0004fT-23 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 20 Oct 2015 16:17:20 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43397) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZodKI-0003ql-WE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Oct 2015 16:16:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZodKI-0005eF-2e for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Oct 2015 16:16:06 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-oi0-x22d.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4003:c06::22d]:36492) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZodKH-0005do-Tl for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Oct 2015 16:16:06 -0400 Original-Received: by oiao187 with SMTP id o187so16885896oia.3 for ; Tue, 20 Oct 2015 13:16:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=wVaeZZzTQ9gf5dGBeorvN+SvFuKcpl5frgiFrBYm9ms=; b=D/HCZf3/zEnqt/kperrFSEimd0HQeb+UbIGJlGxGERJ3xOR3y1h4fZj8dO/RhO0XS4 DAxDRIWDHWbaQhyu/ymsCKQG3sPIfDtXhf+F5WuWB6PjQzamsndj2hBBgL4mpdmwAyYr HdqLlSpO8HeWPCW4frDoDBdEJNqwL7+edPEpZPDL/tTA3TSwlgo03eYiQyjnIT/OomuD 4Si2YKoo8SE6CpuOamnXqySUYUkctCyHZNVben9WbpB9Xg7vHdTkEEhRVN3ttrjGYNVF fRwtZUL9emOroeTuSY/atK4KplhWw7MOYlvoMuD1hV7HAu02N4p/DvaKjA4wlZTA8bHe H63A== X-Received: by 10.202.3.131 with SMTP id 125mr3305083oid.134.1445372165100; Tue, 20 Oct 2015 13:16:05 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.202.44.8 with HTTP; Tue, 20 Oct 2015 13:15:25 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5E6AD325-C652-4C83-A3D8-744BB0467DD6@gmail.com> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:4003:c06::22d X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:192236 Archived-At: --001a113b9626781cc905228eeef1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > I'd like a different shape, but either way Nicolas's current proposal is already a worthy improvement to my eyes. +1 In any case, the new logo without the pen looks nice. -- Kaushal Modi On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 4:05 PM, Chris Van Dusen wrote: > > > > On Oct 20, 2015, at 14:45, Jay Belanger > wrote: > > > > > > Nicolas Petton writes: > > > >> - changed the orientation if the E, to look more dynamic (looking up > >> instead of down) > > > > I thought that part of the orientation was to make it look like an M as > > well as an E. With a different orientation, should it have a different > > shape? > > > > > > I thought that the "E" also served as the stylized horns of the Gnu. > Regardless, the new logo looks nice. > > Chris. > --001a113b9626781cc905228eeef1 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>=C2=A0I'd like a different shape, but= either way Nicolas's current proposal is already a worthy improvement = to my eyes.
+1

In any case, the new logo without the pen = looks nice.=C2=A0

<= div>

--
Kaushal Modi

On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 4:05 PM, Chris Van D= usen <cavandusen@gmail.com> wrote:


> On Oct 20, 2015, at 14:45, Jay Belanger <jay.p.belanger@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Nicolas Petton <nicolas@petton= .fr> writes:
>
>> - changed the orientation if the E, to look more dynamic (looking = up
>>=C2=A0 instead of down)
>
> I thought that part of the orientation was to make it look like an M a= s
> well as an E.=C2=A0 =C2=A0With a different orientation, should it have= a different
> shape?
>
>

I thought that the "E" also served as the=C2=A0 styli= zed horns of the Gnu.=C2=A0 Regardless, the new logo looks nice.

Chris.

--001a113b9626781cc905228eeef1--