On Mon, Sep 18, 2017, 5:47 AM Rasmus <rasmus@gmx.us> wrote:

> Rasmus <rasmus@gmx.us> writes:
>
> > Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
> >
> >>> From: Rasmus <rasmus@gmx.us>
> >>> Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2017 19:05:21 +0200
> >>>
> >>> Would it be OK to aim for including 9.1 in 26.1?
> >>
> >> If you consider it to be stable enough, then yes.
> >
> > It is considered stable.
> >
> > Aside: what would be the "correct" or "best" procedure to update Org it
> in
> > both the master branch and the emacs-26?  E.g. should I commit it to
> > master and then cherry pick it into the emacs-26 branch?
>
> I found the answer in another thread: commit to emacs-26, which is then
> eventually merged with master.
>

Thanks for doing this!

It will be awesome to see the brand new Org (now 9.1.1) in the emacs 26.1
RC.

May be @Nicolas can wait for this merge before cutting the first RC?

> --

Kaushal Modi