Looks like just like the double-angled quotation marks, there are also
single-angled quotation marks "› and ‹" '( http://unicodelookup.com/#angle
quotation/1 )

So does it make sense to bind them to >' and <'

So now we have ended up with

>> → ≫
>= → ≥
>" → »
>' → ›

<< → ≪
<= → ≤
<" → «
<' → ‹





--
Kaushal Modi

On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 12:27 PM, Artur Malabarba <bruce.connor.am@gmail.com
> wrote:

> 2015-05-11 16:40 GMT+01:00 Yuri Khan <yuri.v.khan@gmail.com>:
> > Consider also that there is the ≫ character (U+226B MUCH GREATER
> > THAN), which is semantically a better match for >>.
>
> Good point. Since «» are quotation marks they could instead be moved
> under <" and >". That's not as intuitive, but it's still easy to
> remember once you see it once.
> Also, most cases where a user types C-x 8 >>, they'll be looking for
> the ≫ and not the ». Not that » isn't used, it's just that (I think)
> most people who type » have it in their keyboard layout already.
>