From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Kaushal Modi Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.orgmode Subject: Re: Sync up the org in emacs master to org maint branch? Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2017 16:01:24 +0000 Message-ID: References: <87a8afaxlz.fsf@gmx.us> <83fuk63mq5.fsf@gnu.org> <874m0maq9e.fsf@gmx.us> <87r33psudf.fsf@kyleam.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f403045f7f2aa1c769054701761a X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1485446590 13645 195.159.176.226 (26 Jan 2017 16:03:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2017 16:03:10 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-org list , Stefan Monnier , Rasmus , Emacs developers To: Kyle Meyer Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 26 17:02:58 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cWmVX-0001f3-Vi for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2017 17:02:44 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39513 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cWmVc-0008RV-VZ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2017 11:02:49 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44516) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cWmUS-0008O2-Mt for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2017 11:01:41 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cWmUR-0006Cp-EU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2017 11:01:36 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-ua0-x22a.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400c:c08::22a]:34858) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cWmUR-0006Cd-9y; Thu, 26 Jan 2017 11:01:35 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-ua0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id y9so186213459uae.2; Thu, 26 Jan 2017 08:01:35 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=CpTx5p46mJ6V8TZGp7GQni2Gqk0GQAlTLUOJRHLK37s=; b=LiqgiadlKpPbmHtJlejWjQYL8ONvNwEL6EBsC7LI8IWIhTNsiop4JrCvGBCJHTsMO3 vtQ5hv2k4uivxdvHaNhBtOcopFylL01V80tN2cEPQNXENbmI6F3CcuKDh5hYjcImpLze Z5ogi+AJv5FFIUQ6ZaRlWGuEuJ8PZU5rALWSCfUDfntOSrcZMx8SObCIpSYNQ7NauW32 gu4lkdzRAXx61RXxd6/Ms/Bmjw0hD2Zx/CH2XmiQK+8zIaUF2XaFDfnCQd4auqnpxuv/ dua412W2QKGcWz2wMqpduzOJJ1eMs77DW2CfckzKvYiQI8nfxFsRPdeLaLOq/NGmcnaR pgtg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=CpTx5p46mJ6V8TZGp7GQni2Gqk0GQAlTLUOJRHLK37s=; b=Ehh2dlCqpNcAvah6t1/2Z6gVyyjxWRpfYYQH6tDf3oZjo+uBEofhNGnXDIm6ehnOHH PSUwkH5xg6VPaXW5n3DusigWynSvbLlEZgw8bqkA149F5WE3fRrdVn0d8CS6UwuY2hUx Z2oUPAsrTseR0YUcpY6auV0BUiGADt3r030hP+3FRJN0keeaCzvJuf5TA8/jsZsCNTNC bQVICP/SOA021kDtwJ8mQsNY3Br8z3Vy0DgOQaax3CHUF3XogRqH/tG/8UQsrF8WMMdY +3dNJQ7n0LLx3GwFWy33ud6T1kun4aV4YV0HkIS/QgX4keB9sSc66q07zFd6dpsyJ5dC oWbA== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXLfHuPiQl3mHTTRL38oNiFtKHT53uSs0sjrwTmkZXoz+QsO9uST0+4gANHa8YBzCpuUxWxj7Gl1l5EZ4Q== X-Received: by 10.176.91.72 with SMTP id v8mr1959330uae.23.1485446494404; Thu, 26 Jan 2017 08:01:34 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87r33psudf.fsf@kyleam.com> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:400c:c08::22a X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:211618 gmane.emacs.orgmode:111705 Archived-At: --f403045f7f2aa1c769054701761a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 10:39 AM Kyle Meyer wrote: > Kaushal Modi writes: > > > On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 1:19 AM Kyle Meyer wrote: > > > >> We'd want at least one more release from maint, I think, so that'd be > >> 9.0.5. > > > > Would it be OK to sync the current stable 9.0.4, > > I don't think that's a good idea. Since 9.0.4, I've backported one > remaining commit from Emacs, I've adjusted :version in defcustoms to the > appropriate version for a sync targeting Emacs's master, and I've > cleaned up the spacing in a few places so that all the files pass > Emacs's pre-commit check. > Makes sense. Thanks for the explanation. > > We never know, we might end up with even higher stable releases by the > > time emacs 26.1 is released. > > I suspect we will, given that 9.0.1 -> 9.0.4 have all been released > since this November. > I don't believe that the target date has yet been set for releasing 26.1. We are currently on the release candidate testing stage of 25.2. So I will not be surprised if 26.1 get released even 3 months or 6 months from now. Eli? John? -- Kaushal Modi --f403045f7f2aa1c769054701761a Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Thu, Jan 26= , 2017 at 10:39 AM Kyle Meyer <kyle@k= yleam.com> wrote:
Kaushal = Modi <kaushal.modi@gmail.com> writes:

> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 1:19 AM Kyle Meyer <kyle@kyleam.com> w= rote:
>
>> We'd want at least one more release from maint, I think, so th= at'd be
>> 9.0.5.
>
> Would it be OK to sync the current stable 9.0.4,

I don't think that's a good idea.=C2=A0 Since 9.0.4, I've backp= orted one
remaining commit from Emacs, I've adjusted :version in defcustoms to th= e
appropriate version for a sync targeting Emacs's master, and I've cleaned up the spacing in a few places so that all the files pass
Emacs's pre-commit check.

=
Makes sense. Thanks for the explanation.
=C2=A0
<= blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px= #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">> We never know, we might end up with even= higher stable releases by the
> time emacs 26.1 is released.

I suspect we will, given that 9.0.1 -> 9.0.4 have all been released
since this November.

I don't believe that the target date has yet been set for releasing 2= 6.1. We are currently on the release candidate testing stage of 25.2. So I = will not be surprised if 26.1 get released even 3 months or 6 months from n= ow. Eli? John?
--

Kaushal Modi

--f403045f7f2aa1c769054701761a--