From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kaushal Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: =?UTF-8?B?Qy14IDggc2hvcnRoYW5kcyBmb3Ig4omkIGFuZCDiiaU=?= Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 13:22:31 +0000 Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e01160574358b5f0515ce4547 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1431350570 28252 80.91.229.3 (11 May 2015 13:22:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 13:22:50 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: eggert@cs.ucla.edu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon May 11 15:22:50 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YrnfS-0006J4-7f for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 11 May 2015 15:22:46 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37369 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YrnfR-0008Ug-AL for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 11 May 2015 09:22:45 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38492) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YrnfJ-0008UN-6E for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 May 2015 09:22:43 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YrnfF-0007DE-2P for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 May 2015 09:22:37 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-yk0-x230.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4002:c07::230]:34316) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YrnfE-0007Bp-US for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 May 2015 09:22:33 -0400 Original-Received: by ykft189 with SMTP id t189so37285581ykf.1 for ; Mon, 11 May 2015 06:22:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=fd+knk+tAGn+Xab9qBA/KGFLqxZxZr8KVV2APvue2Ic=; b=ed2bxMasCAs/hbPplFedPGFrMX7AefDo1MHwnWFbPWNTzDV3qW4leeNlvFs/mmvrgO eSBoZwRE1r+kzQcYWizRd2TkoNB9dLEEqrDK/8Yg03KvryEDwA53DgETHfYEBS6oN85E 2ZPskT2qaWJ1VPvsfR34mQHg95urHLQrZvoz1z3l7J/sOX875sV5Qix4jl87dem92POc Ej2VQUDClG/KWGyNqhVs4gb4BRR1XWyf+OtdjrZzT/cE4/hm82pdkl0NoJmjr7+NKb6f L7BJRwy7Lh7kJgL0nlKORyELKB6o0Jd1IkJy+ebnYv8Qj7B8OcWT4zjlLKEdS1AfmtOH UT2w== X-Received: by 10.236.45.38 with SMTP id o26mr10184014yhb.161.1431350552134; Mon, 11 May 2015 06:22:32 -0700 (PDT) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:4002:c07::230 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:186397 Archived-At: --089e01160574358b5f0515ce4547 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Paul, Added bindings for some of the frequently used unicode chars was a small but welcome udpate (referrring to this commit: http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git/commit/?id=3D4b41540b424468aeca8= 7b9b47ffda2be25c5dac4 ) I simply wanted to comment on these bindings: ("_<" . [?=E2=89=A4]) ("_>" . [?=E2=89=A5]) Can the bindings be changed to these: ("<=3D" . [?=E2=89=A4]) (">=3D" . [?=E2=89=A5]) The reason is that we use =E2=89=A4 when implementing "LESS than or EQUAL t= o (<=3D)" comparision and =E2=89=A5 when implementing "GREATER than or EQUAL to (>=3D= )" comparision. So "<=3D" will probably be more intuitive than "_<" and same applies for ">= =3D" and "_>". I can of course create my own binding to do that and the bindings you have are not difficult to remember. But I thought of mentioning this as it's early enough to change the bindings if you and others agree with my reasoning. --089e01160574358b5f0515ce4547 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Paul,

Added bindings for some of the= frequently used unicode chars was a small but welcome udpate (referrring t= o this commit:=C2=A0http://git.savannah.g= nu.org/cgit/emacs.git/commit/?id=3D4b41540b424468aeca87b9b47ffda2be25c5dac4= )

I simply wanted to comment on these binding= s:

(&q= uot;_<" . [?=E2=89=A4])
("_>" . [?=E2=89=A5])

Can= the bindings be changed to these:

("<=3D" . [?=E2=89=A4])
(">=3D" . [?=E2=89=A5])


The reason is that we use =E2=89=A4 w= hen implementing "LESS than or EQUAL to (<=3D)" comparision an= d=C2=A0=E2=89=A5 when implementing "GREATER than or EQUAL to (>=3D)= " comparision.

So "<=3D" will pr= obably be more intuitive than "_<" and same applies for "= >=3D" and "_>".=C2=A0

I can o= f course create my own binding to do that and the bindings you have are not= difficult to remember.

But I thought of mentionin= g this as it's early enough to change the bindings if you and others ag= ree with my reasoning.
--089e01160574358b5f0515ce4547--