From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kaushal Modi <kaushal.modi@gmail.com> Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Edebug: avoid messages on 'f' command Date: Sat, 07 May 2016 13:40:56 +0000 Message-ID: <CAFyQvY0KxYQUCkOi1yjdtYobB4nG5VQTNPrvb2JcRJe5LQHNjA@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAG7BpapVWrxhCiFKKMhoZO0_cnyOPRy-HaFa93qUByW3SRtszQ@mail.gmail.com> <20160505131010.GC1950@acm.fritz.box> <CAG7Bpapk43Z_ZEqZrpMod06-j6seCbbNB4X3mPemZCbXutYu1Q@mail.gmail.com> <20160507065745.GA8759@acm.fritz.box> <CAG7BpapG8j6qAkBgU9NGTgh4ZwcEXKaxjf2t7dw7zjM-jyjyWg@mail.gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0149bff63a22a8053240bacd X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1462628504 5611 80.91.229.3 (7 May 2016 13:41:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 7 May 2016 13:41:44 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Paul Pogonyshev <pogonyshev@gmail.com>, Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de> Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat May 07 15:41:33 2016 Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org> Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>) id 1az2U5-0005z4-KO for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 07 May 2016 15:41:29 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34165 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>) id 1az2U4-0002G2-0k for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 07 May 2016 09:41:28 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51104) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <kaushal.modi@gmail.com>) id 1az2Tm-0002Ar-Qp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 07 May 2016 09:41:12 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <kaushal.modi@gmail.com>) id 1az2Tk-0001tk-2w for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 07 May 2016 09:41:09 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-ob0-x235.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4003:c01::235]:33656) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <kaushal.modi@gmail.com>) id 1az2Tj-0001tW-Th for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 07 May 2016 09:41:08 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-ob0-x235.google.com with SMTP id x1so64309159obt.0 for <emacs-devel@gnu.org>; Sat, 07 May 2016 06:41:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=V/F+8BVxSwCqtjy04L4l68T3KMNoIHemnVhCok151mk=; b=dKxyNa7fad5CKFt6pD18Biza+A2rM3Sr3ga38vp6jxufk6AOAaad73khxNahHU+rqs KgXUsEgdn9mZo35gpSFe5FYxKYjbRTnSLNyREQr+cvj/YJaa57NR/cXRGG2W8M0dyNhD yQnFtGw3Y0yggGRe3/N9B0nqGAV3wDNh3EeyTOlqYL54gqZ32LqQzA9FpBFPorzbQzOy aXVECSQ3RCsaGH4BY1DdcZjqmqP/F0SZVIrbYBGkZ6R09VDkpKc6/317RFg8feuOZx25 xykjbpCMRO+GyZTA+HI4q0iVZqOtLhyiSXrvnuo6xtCLm6tA6RjOIonE9HGlG4hljS/E Pn6w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=V/F+8BVxSwCqtjy04L4l68T3KMNoIHemnVhCok151mk=; b=N6m+tzyhiiGFutC2OiXtO/UQ5sRPnjSdpBr/5kwpzVMlj7axNmAUVaR9PwTmoax3+P cVbHcdfANPji1T0S1mKMp1XiRVUtyPrK//WKKonFC85xABT2vWMRLBsRCEK6mzD0bLIP N520+mjGQRxAsu4q9IfrZMHLcvQM56+La9yhaAdOGvGpyL0CeS1AUrLsfu5TLXMlgOLD /o2WWP/z4m/3Z53uyPbfs3QQF2TcYR0oKS02EWPlswzkKuuAGjEDZfhavvw4BCGzRGzv aaomjjxi3hPQ93415Ev0LVaQw+PV0Gc3PJjRnwJugAe6jqXSntwtWxu69bBQH1Xh0zSa PJzw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FX64NbkCfEV0Fkl2S23rlPTLzfo/tT2w6CBXXGwedupQV1hhvO3nVxypgzcpcpkuYg0j3YPZr/vIdRDYg== X-Received: by 10.182.224.137 with SMTP id rc9mr11900752obc.39.1462628467218; Sat, 07 May 2016 06:41:07 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <CAG7BpapG8j6qAkBgU9NGTgh4ZwcEXKaxjf2t7dw7zjM-jyjyWg@mail.gmail.com> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:4003:c01::235 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>, <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/> List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>, <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org> Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:203665 Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/203665> --089e0149bff63a22a8053240bacd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Using git blame, you can find the original author who add that 1 second delay. You can then copy them in this thread asking why they added that. I use edebug but have never used the breakpoints (next thing to try out on my list now). But I think that removing that delay permanently would be fine too, unless there was a specify reason to add it in the first place. On Sat, May 7, 2016, 7:55 AM Paul Pogonyshev <pogonyshev@gmail.com> wrote: > On 7 May 2016 at 08:57, Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de> wrote: > > One thing's puzzling me - who would ever want that one second of "Break" > > in the echo area? It's annoying, and it's scarcely useful information. > > Maybe I should just have ripped out that bit of code entirely. > > I wouldn't mind. And judging by the quite poor usability of Edebug in > general, I think others wouldn't care. > > Paul > > -- -- Kaushal Modi --089e0149bff63a22a8053240bacd Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <p dir=3D"ltr">Using git blame, you can find the original author who add th= at 1 second delay. You can then copy them in this thread asking why they ad= ded that. </p> <p dir=3D"ltr">I use edebug but have never used the breakpoints (next thing= to try out on my list now). But I think that removing that delay permanent= ly would be fine too, unless there was a specify reason to add it in the fi= rst place. </p> <br><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><div dir=3D"ltr">On Sat, May 7, 2016, 7:55 A= M Paul Pogonyshev <<a href=3D"mailto:pogonyshev@gmail.com">pogonyshev@gm= ail.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"= margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">On 7 May 201= 6 at 08:57, Alan Mackenzie <<a href=3D"mailto:acm@muc.de" target=3D"_bla= nk">acm@muc.de</a>> wrote:<br> > One thing's puzzling me - who would ever want that one second of &= quot;Break"<br> > in the echo area?=C2=A0 It's annoying, and it's scarcely usefu= l information.<br> > Maybe I should just have ripped out that bit of code entirely.<br> <br> I wouldn't mind. And judging by the quite poor usability of Edebug in<b= r> general, I think others wouldn't care.<br> <br> Paul<br> <br> </blockquote></div><div dir=3D"ltr">-- <br></div><p dir=3D"ltr">-- <br> Kaushal Modi</p> --089e0149bff63a22a8053240bacd--