From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Kaushal Modi <kaushal.modi@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Edebug: avoid messages on 'f' command
Date: Sat, 07 May 2016 13:40:56 +0000
Message-ID: <CAFyQvY0KxYQUCkOi1yjdtYobB4nG5VQTNPrvb2JcRJe5LQHNjA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAG7BpapVWrxhCiFKKMhoZO0_cnyOPRy-HaFa93qUByW3SRtszQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<20160505131010.GC1950@acm.fritz.box>
	<CAG7Bpapk43Z_ZEqZrpMod06-j6seCbbNB4X3mPemZCbXutYu1Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<20160507065745.GA8759@acm.fritz.box>
	<CAG7BpapG8j6qAkBgU9NGTgh4ZwcEXKaxjf2t7dw7zjM-jyjyWg@mail.gmail.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0149bff63a22a8053240bacd
X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1462628504 5611 80.91.229.3 (7 May 2016 13:41:44 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 7 May 2016 13:41:44 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Paul Pogonyshev <pogonyshev@gmail.com>, Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat May 07 15:41:33 2016
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17])
	by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1az2U5-0005z4-KO
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 07 May 2016 15:41:29 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34165 helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1az2U4-0002G2-0k
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 07 May 2016 09:41:28 -0400
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51104)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <kaushal.modi@gmail.com>) id 1az2Tm-0002Ar-Qp
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 07 May 2016 09:41:12 -0400
Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <kaushal.modi@gmail.com>) id 1az2Tk-0001tk-2w
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 07 May 2016 09:41:09 -0400
Original-Received: from mail-ob0-x235.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4003:c01::235]:33656)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <kaushal.modi@gmail.com>) id 1az2Tj-0001tW-Th
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 07 May 2016 09:41:08 -0400
Original-Received: by mail-ob0-x235.google.com with SMTP id x1so64309159obt.0
	for <emacs-devel@gnu.org>; Sat, 07 May 2016 06:41:07 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to
	:cc; bh=V/F+8BVxSwCqtjy04L4l68T3KMNoIHemnVhCok151mk=;
	b=dKxyNa7fad5CKFt6pD18Biza+A2rM3Sr3ga38vp6jxufk6AOAaad73khxNahHU+rqs
	KgXUsEgdn9mZo35gpSFe5FYxKYjbRTnSLNyREQr+cvj/YJaa57NR/cXRGG2W8M0dyNhD
	yQnFtGw3Y0yggGRe3/N9B0nqGAV3wDNh3EeyTOlqYL54gqZ32LqQzA9FpBFPorzbQzOy
	aXVECSQ3RCsaGH4BY1DdcZjqmqP/F0SZVIrbYBGkZ6R09VDkpKc6/317RFg8feuOZx25
	xykjbpCMRO+GyZTA+HI4q0iVZqOtLhyiSXrvnuo6xtCLm6tA6RjOIonE9HGlG4hljS/E
	Pn6w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
	h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
	:message-id:subject:to:cc;
	bh=V/F+8BVxSwCqtjy04L4l68T3KMNoIHemnVhCok151mk=;
	b=N6m+tzyhiiGFutC2OiXtO/UQ5sRPnjSdpBr/5kwpzVMlj7axNmAUVaR9PwTmoax3+P
	cVbHcdfANPji1T0S1mKMp1XiRVUtyPrK//WKKonFC85xABT2vWMRLBsRCEK6mzD0bLIP
	N520+mjGQRxAsu4q9IfrZMHLcvQM56+La9yhaAdOGvGpyL0CeS1AUrLsfu5TLXMlgOLD
	/o2WWP/z4m/3Z53uyPbfs3QQF2TcYR0oKS02EWPlswzkKuuAGjEDZfhavvw4BCGzRGzv
	aaomjjxi3hPQ93415Ev0LVaQw+PV0Gc3PJjRnwJugAe6jqXSntwtWxu69bBQH1Xh0zSa
	PJzw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FX64NbkCfEV0Fkl2S23rlPTLzfo/tT2w6CBXXGwedupQV1hhvO3nVxypgzcpcpkuYg0j3YPZr/vIdRDYg==
X-Received: by 10.182.224.137 with SMTP id rc9mr11900752obc.39.1462628467218; 
	Sat, 07 May 2016 06:41:07 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAG7BpapG8j6qAkBgU9NGTgh4ZwcEXKaxjf2t7dw7zjM-jyjyWg@mail.gmail.com>
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic]
X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:4003:c01::235
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:203665
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/203665>

--089e0149bff63a22a8053240bacd
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Using git blame, you can find the original author who add that 1 second
delay. You can then copy them in this thread asking why they added that.

I use edebug but have never used the breakpoints (next thing to try out on
my list now). But I think that removing that delay permanently would be
fine too, unless there was a specify reason to add it in the first place.

On Sat, May 7, 2016, 7:55 AM Paul Pogonyshev <pogonyshev@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 7 May 2016 at 08:57, Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de> wrote:
> > One thing's puzzling me - who would ever want that one second of "Break"
> > in the echo area?  It's annoying, and it's scarcely useful information.
> > Maybe I should just have ripped out that bit of code entirely.
>
> I wouldn't mind. And judging by the quite poor usability of Edebug in
> general, I think others wouldn't care.
>
> Paul
>
> --

-- 
Kaushal Modi

--089e0149bff63a22a8053240bacd
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<p dir=3D"ltr">Using git blame, you can find the original author who add th=
at 1 second delay. You can then copy them in this thread asking why they ad=
ded that. </p>
<p dir=3D"ltr">I use edebug but have never used the breakpoints (next thing=
 to try out on my list now). But I think that removing that delay permanent=
ly would be fine too, unless there was a specify reason to add it in the fi=
rst place. </p>
<br><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><div dir=3D"ltr">On Sat, May 7, 2016, 7:55 A=
M Paul Pogonyshev &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:pogonyshev@gmail.com">pogonyshev@gm=
ail.com</a>&gt; wrote:<br></div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"=
margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">On 7 May 201=
6 at 08:57, Alan Mackenzie &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:acm@muc.de" target=3D"_bla=
nk">acm@muc.de</a>&gt; wrote:<br>
&gt; One thing&#39;s puzzling me - who would ever want that one second of &=
quot;Break&quot;<br>
&gt; in the echo area?=C2=A0 It&#39;s annoying, and it&#39;s scarcely usefu=
l information.<br>
&gt; Maybe I should just have ripped out that bit of code entirely.<br>
<br>
I wouldn&#39;t mind. And judging by the quite poor usability of Edebug in<b=
r>
general, I think others wouldn&#39;t care.<br>
<br>
Paul<br>
<br>
</blockquote></div><div dir=3D"ltr">-- <br></div><p dir=3D"ltr">-- <br>
Kaushal Modi</p>

--089e0149bff63a22a8053240bacd--