From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kaushal Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: =?UTF-8?B?UmU6IEMteCA4IHNob3J0aGFuZHMgZm9yIOKJpCBhbmQg4oml?= Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 13:29:40 +0000 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1136b3b6cc7f0f0515ce5e77 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1431350994 3321 80.91.229.3 (11 May 2015 13:29:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 13:29:54 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: eggert@cs.ucla.edu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon May 11 15:29:54 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YrnmK-0001RN-GJ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 11 May 2015 15:29:52 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37392 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YrnmJ-0002Bf-FX for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 11 May 2015 09:29:51 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40246) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YrnmE-0002BS-C8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 May 2015 09:29:47 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YrnmA-0002IB-4M for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 May 2015 09:29:46 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-yk0-x22a.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4002:c07::22a]:32965) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yrnm9-0002I1-Sw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 May 2015 09:29:42 -0400 Original-Received: by ykeo186 with SMTP id o186so37237386yke.0 for ; Mon, 11 May 2015 06:29:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=MjwSofS1IbIP0R3pxDsSsIJJEoak6QJ8B8xQ4+0UmzU=; b=Ytf5SCHVMgf0Qjw88xjx5Uv8Ygxb0S3Tip+rONhcUUlVPU8dhTNRtCcE5jDx1WoSk4 HV6nFuHgtP3bRaJGaUwNIBwuJfiMhitSRjndZ9o9eJ4XddtvcfPnp0yKFA7tsfpsjfYm SQc7t0zin06BKoiuq4sGI7+3enRBVfVkTdpM3bquY64QZBtO562AAtT3OYKklGiVo7/Z +IOQhMEx4kqq2bwhFt7oOouCmsFPIIS68O44Vjb7aKEyWNz5DsdHZTjF3tc0m+6+ON3j /AGQJ6VGfBkE7Sc1w+rgNKaJXjBpic+Y4/llQTBGO15mDHupRukJK6WjMBleG1VdQ5Yi UBJQ== X-Received: by 10.236.10.103 with SMTP id 67mr10379180yhu.148.1431350981457; Mon, 11 May 2015 06:29:41 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:4002:c07::22a X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:186398 Archived-At: --001a1136b3b6cc7f0f0515ce5e77 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Oh well, nevermind, ">" is already bound to =C2=BB "<" is already boudn to =C2=AB On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 9:22 AM Kaushal wrote: > Hi Paul, > > Added bindings for some of the frequently used unicode chars was a small > but welcome udpate (referrring to this commit: > http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git/commit/?id=3D4b41540b424468aec= a87b9b47ffda2be25c5dac4 > ) > > I simply wanted to comment on these bindings: > > ("_<" . [?=E2=89=A4]) > ("_>" . [?=E2=89=A5]) > > Can the bindings be changed to these: > > ("<=3D" . [?=E2=89=A4]) > (">=3D" . [?=E2=89=A5]) > > > The reason is that we use =E2=89=A4 when implementing "LESS than or EQUAL= to (<=3D)" > comparision and =E2=89=A5 when implementing "GREATER than or EQUAL to (>= =3D)" > comparision. > > So "<=3D" will probably be more intuitive than "_<" and same applies for > ">=3D" and "_>". > > I can of course create my own binding to do that and the bindings you hav= e > are not difficult to remember. > > But I thought of mentioning this as it's early enough to change the > bindings if you and others agree with my reasoning. > --001a1136b3b6cc7f0f0515ce5e77 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Oh well, nevermind,

">" is already bou= nd to=C2=A0=C2=BB
"<" is already boudn to =C2=AB
=

On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 9:22 AM Kausha= l <kaushal.modi@gmail.com&= gt; wrote:
Hi Paul,
=
Added bindings for some of the frequently used unicode chars= was a small but welcome udpate (referrring to this commit:=C2=A0http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/= emacs.git/commit/?id=3D4b41540b424468aeca87b9b47ffda2be25c5dac4 )
=

I simply wanted to comment on these bindings:

("_<" . [= ?=E2=89=A4])
("_>" .= [?=E2=89=A5])

Can the bindings be changed to these:

("<=3D" . [?=E2=89=A4= ])
(">=3D" . [?=E2= =89=A5])


The reason is that we use = =E2=89=A4 when implementing "LESS than or EQUAL to (<=3D)" com= parision and=C2=A0=E2=89=A5 when implementing "GREATER than or EQUAL t= o (>=3D)" comparision.

So "<=3D&qu= ot; will probably be more intuitive than "_<" and same applies= for ">=3D" and "_>".=C2=A0

<= div>I can of course create my own binding to do that and the bindings you h= ave are not difficult to remember.

But I thought o= f mentioning this as it's early enough to change the bindings if you an= d others agree with my reasoning.
--001a1136b3b6cc7f0f0515ce5e77--