From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Kaushal Modi Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Odd block highlighting [master build] Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2016 20:10:26 +0000 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114e162c9aa210053cf60524 X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1474402288 11658 195.159.176.226 (20 Sep 2016 20:11:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2016 20:11:28 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs developers To: Noam Postavsky , John Mastro Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 20 22:11:24 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bmRNv-0002BR-Vz for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 20 Sep 2016 22:11:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37816 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bmRNu-00010i-9F for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 20 Sep 2016 16:11:18 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35655) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bmRNH-0000zK-WC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Sep 2016 16:10:40 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bmRNG-0001Jv-0K for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Sep 2016 16:10:38 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-vk0-x22c.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400c:c05::22c]:34797) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bmRNF-0001Ja-He for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Sep 2016 16:10:37 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-vk0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id o139so55279645vka.1 for ; Tue, 20 Sep 2016 13:10:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=GVajAl7qOi6y8DexzA3JBqOlqs7ZXowddFUXw532w2E=; b=bUZsVgew5vWmwiyWHNEJQr4cBcu9LQ53FcYBvs8qH49n69qWvykPYSD+GP4wIaoc2/ XTJQr6Q1YWil9Bsc/eFLfPx9dYwtBVmSc/hLMvYMzEo08ZYcZq6buNljqtMxe3CpzHAN wmERu9ydPiMNJ4oYdsm4MaTWyveKcl4sW1ICJKIf5dWXq5vAv7Ti9WH1QHLB4LfcHFii q2Ex8318RNkm+m8B/Xe65Vsbg1qTLk5v+egp/sKodB7OHZjr6KhjndbUZTPCDQGctAhG JMSSc7R38uJYy78t4tRls9QN9VSG7FPy0xxLg2X9JpS5zhzuyc6m11XvhrYhAQOKKdfW SUCQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=GVajAl7qOi6y8DexzA3JBqOlqs7ZXowddFUXw532w2E=; b=c/lqQiAn9YtBFz0NbpJdW10fy0jo6VG3DFZ8k9tdHH+AQJ25/MACPYosPUe9u4ykD4 GxQLGcMcZ0yWMEnC3ay3ineqH+5WxMIJHdEFOEpWsoridsRfMHPxADtbmXDA9fMBP20z Vt8755X4uH5oLID8u0QmukHDn/l9yA2Kpsc5qzjKGqMY2Nrjd9TKM34UQyxuSbjnanuT DEt5aiJWyhzw0+j1j0+Oc9Ku/xLNHDrLhtpZZ4ojTUxLEgfjCaauPqv2j0JORCA31YwS ivi+wDaUetR2D1WtQBnPFRtcapR+i9KyMxGTyB7XaSn5ioxY6SMiujrDyYWqr59BmiAh +eXQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwOXP30T93Z3i9X9Xq2JvtkzfLKS7iET3pDTgY0P90nVaAF7r20DrgOQxnjZBzDHVBQoI0Stt0kEUVInEw== X-Received: by 10.31.89.6 with SMTP id n6mr4935163vkb.104.1474402237192; Tue, 20 Sep 2016 13:10:37 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:400c:c05::22c X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:207640 Archived-At: --001a114e162c9aa210053cf60524 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 4:06 PM Kaushal Modi wrote: > > I do not understand overlays very well, but it looks like verilog-mode or > some minor mode created 5 overlays over the same region, and they did not > get removed even when those modes were disabled. > Some more info.. with each revert-buffer call, that overlay is replicating over the same region.. I reverted the buffer 4-5 times and now in the C-u C-x = generated Help buffer, I see.. From 1466 to 1482 end-closed t evaporate t local-map [Show] mouse-face highlight start-closed t verilog-include-file t From 1466 to 1482 end-closed t evaporate t local-map [Show] mouse-face highlight start-closed t verilog-include-file t ... (and so on 27 times!) -- Kaushal Modi --001a114e162c9aa210053cf60524 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Tue, Sep 20= , 2016 at 4:06 PM Kaushal Modi <kaushal.modi@gmail.com> wrote:

I do not unde= rstand overlays very well, but it looks like verilog-mode or some minor mod= e created 5 overlays over the same region, and they did not get removed eve= n when those modes were disabled.

Some more info.. with each revert-buffer call, that overlay is rep= licating over the same region.. I reverted the buffer 4-5 times and now in = the C-u C-x =3D generated Help buffer, I see..

=C2= =A0From 1466 to 1482
=C2=A0 end-closed =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2= =A0 =C2=A0 t
=C2=A0 evaporate =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0t
=C2=A0 local-map =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2= =A0[Show]
=C2=A0 mouse-face =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 hi= ghlight
=C2=A0 start-closed =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 t
=C2=A0 verilog-include-file t
=C2=A0From 1466 to 1482
=C2=A0 end-closed =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 t
=C2=A0 e= vaporate =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0t
=C2=A0 local-= map =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0[Show]
=C2=A0 mouse-= face =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 highlight
=C2=A0 start-cl= osed =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 t
=C2=A0 verilog-include-file t= =C2=A0
...

(and so on 27 times!)

--

Kaushal Modi

--001a114e162c9aa210053cf60524--