Le ven. 11 sept. 2020 à 17:49, Eli Zaretskii a écrit : > > From: Thibaut Verron > > Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2020 17:36:24 +0200 > > Cc: rpluim@gmail.com, spacibba@aol.com, caiohcs0@gmail.com, > > emacs-devel@gnu.org, rekado@elephly.net, ghe@sdf.org, > drew.adams@oracle.com > > > > "Other applications" mostly don't support buffers with no associated > > files, so we had to make a decision which of these two to use. Since > > those other applications force you to decide on exit whether to save > > your edits or not, we decided it was more like what Emacs does with > > buffers that do visit files. > > > > Don't they? As far as I can remember, Libreoffice does, MS office does, > Notepad does... > > > > They call it "new document" rather than "new file" for this reason, I > guess. > > And ask you where to save it when you exit. That's what Emacs does > with file-visiting buffers. > Yes but if you don't want to save it, you can just click discard and never input a path. With the current setting you need to choose a path before you can write text. > > Maybe this button could be bound to a function creating a new buffer > with a name like *unnamed[-n]*, and > > also mark these buffers for query for save on exit? > > AFAIR, that was considered. Maybe you want to read those old > discussions. > Right, I will. :) No need to run in circles. >