From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?B?0JrQvtC90YHRgtCw0L3RgtC40L0g0JrRg9C70LjQutC+0LI=?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: lexical-let cause memory leaks? Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 19:09:47 +0400 Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf30334dd5b85fa904b7c03c31 X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1327936217 24014 80.91.229.3 (30 Jan 2012 15:10:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 15:10:17 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 30 16:10:15 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Rrsru-0007yD-Tm for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 16:10:07 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47747 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rrsrt-0004Cq-RR for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 10:10:05 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:54736) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rrsrh-0004B8-3O for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 10:10:04 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rrsrb-0000w3-Ts for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 10:09:53 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-qw0-f41.google.com ([209.85.216.41]:43036) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rrsrb-0000vw-Rd for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 10:09:47 -0500 Original-Received: by qadz32 with SMTP id z32so2914172qad.0 for ; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 07:09:47 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=mroUbeo+31PIg0oZ/o5PJiO7XmjyfGHA6oW3d49UbDc=; b=hC/32/EwbsOu/Xscp1HjL/FTZYbNXbhAIN/KQnfKm7hZcr65F8jHzxQ19It8FSM8Zb 0sCDfoylBhY8YltvOVKdk5LJ7KzO1rqr0uARZlsa1kCWZ7YO6f2qcDgGNfhGJ35fmhe4 SHdpADAIRQ97DQO8MJM5ISvHZFi7UQiRqWEvo= Original-Received: by 10.224.177.68 with SMTP id bh4mr685711qab.2.1327936187162; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 07:09:47 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.229.24.8 with HTTP; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 07:09:47 -0800 (PST) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 209.85.216.41 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:148041 Archived-At: --20cf30334dd5b85fa904b7c03c31 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Original: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/9062580/when-does-emacs-lisps-lexical-let-leak-memory So... Is it true, that "variables bound with lexical-let are never released, even if they are never used"? And if so, may it be fixed? --20cf30334dd5b85fa904b7c03c31 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Original: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/9062= 580/when-does-emacs-lisps-lexical-let-leak-memory
So... Is it true,= that "variables bound with lexical-let are n= ever released, even if they are never used"?
And if so, may it be fixed?
--20cf30334dd5b85fa904b7c03c31--