From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lally Singh Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Guile emacs thread (again) Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 15:34:47 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87wq97i78i.fsf@earlgrey.lan> <87zjdyf3lo.fsf@fimbulvetr.bsc.es> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11339b20f7663d050347f511 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1410982506 18544 80.91.229.3 (17 Sep 2014 19:35:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 19:35:06 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: =?UTF-8?B?TGx1w61z?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Sep 17 21:34:59 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XUL0F-00013Y-Co for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 21:34:59 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46970 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XUL0E-00023q-O7 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 15:34:58 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56266) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XUL0B-00023i-0Q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 15:34:56 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XUL09-0007eE-LC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 15:34:54 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-vc0-x22f.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400c:c03::22f]:59844) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XUL09-0007dk-GU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 15:34:53 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-vc0-f175.google.com with SMTP id hq11so1754650vcb.34 for ; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 12:34:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=Drq/KrIyMaUBQxSxDq3GPcIqgGlODoR1zJtw2i43BJA=; b=Zudfl5290wJK4fnw2Sz+kwtqCEA7m8Bk+mpyhVKw81VLbwyCY/cRjvvVYhW6qhmu75 qr6b3QWYp8R7ZQfM6cy8kVIjFRfnEvDnlSPPgQQceIx1vhQEKa7cChKhx6JdPPsL3+Mu qanEOT1DmUWVO9LfHVY6QuiROEr9fS3ZCoyc8JWFdpUCilSHW48vdInGhQL8mMieeH/3 rqENFRbGcPmfEMlsPcTOyxWfFST9NMMwaymCgO0uGr/tunmKHMfpBp67Il3h8KmJKfFE nDlooLkK4luIUhDjx55hKIyKAj4QrcpAQfonefXK6opRefbEGX5B4in8HfQ7p6sWXCvD W2EA== X-Received: by 10.221.19.196 with SMTP id ql4mr2602262vcb.42.1410982487744; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 12:34:47 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.52.109.132 with HTTP; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 12:34:47 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87zjdyf3lo.fsf@fimbulvetr.bsc.es> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:400c:c03::22f X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:174462 Archived-At: --001a11339b20f7663d050347f511 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 3:29 PM, Llu=C3=ADs wrote: > [..] > Thus I would say that the only critical point here is the first one > (manpower/responsiveness). To some extent, the second point could be a > problem > too (direction/design), but targeting Emacs to the lower-level layers of > Guile > could limit the impact of this factor. > We should also be mindful of the effects of what such a large project as emacs would have suddenly coming into a project with a substantially smaller community. The emacs'ers could end up taking over, even if nobody intended for that to happen. --001a11339b20f7663d050347f511 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

= On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 3:29 PM, Llu=C3=ADs <xscript@gmx.net> wrote:
[..]
Thus I would say that the only critical point here is the first one
(manpower/responsiveness). To some extent, the second point could be a prob= lem
too (direction/design), but targeting Emacs to the lower-level layers of Gu= ile
could limit the impact of this factor.

= We should also be mindful of the effects of what such a large project as em= acs would have suddenly coming into a project with a substantially smaller = community. =C2=A0The emacs'ers could end up taking over, even if nobody= intended for that to happen.=C2=A0
--001a11339b20f7663d050347f511--