From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Fabrice Popineau Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Suspicious warning in W64 build Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 13:47:28 +0200 Message-ID: References: <1017454172.910810.1504618695244@mail.libero.it> <102a4c21-c275-c73e-ec53-0d85975dc968@cs.ucla.edu> <83a825znuf.fsf@gnu.org> <831snhzkgw.fsf@gnu.org> <837ex9x7vf.fsf@gnu.org> <83tw0cwcle.fsf@gnu.org> <83h8wcw3td.fsf@gnu.org> <83377vx3d0.fsf@gnu.org> <83ingnq01t.fsf@gnu.org> <83fubrpxsv.fsf@gnu.org> <83r2v9masw.fsf@gnu.org> <83d16smj5o.fsf@gnu.org> <9b9bfa40-a248-ed77-6522-53fe73e55434@cs.ucla.edu> <83d16pjt4v.fsf@gnu.org> <20652871-2c71-4628-00e2-96532d5d6a45@cs.ucla.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f403043b010cd93d3f0559754f65" X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1505735392 23112 195.159.176.226 (18 Sep 2017 11:49:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 11:49:52 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Richard Copley , Eli Zaretskii , Emacs developers To: Paul Eggert Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Sep 18 13:49:46 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dtuYZ-0005f7-Tx for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 18 Sep 2017 13:49:44 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35880 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dtuYh-0005Vs-5h for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 18 Sep 2017 07:49:51 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43786) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dtuWt-0004qN-6J for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Sep 2017 07:48:00 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dtuWs-0001XG-94 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Sep 2017 07:47:59 -0400 Original-Received: from smtp2.supelec.fr ([160.228.120.31]:44449) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dtuWm-0001VI-Ok; Mon, 18 Sep 2017 07:47:52 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp2.supelec.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC21E80552; Mon, 18 Sep 2017 13:47:50 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at smtp2.supelec.fr Original-Received: from smtp2.supelec.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp2.supelec.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AsnuEJBV1hqP; Mon, 18 Sep 2017 13:47:50 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from mail-qt0-f175.google.com (mail-qt0-f175.google.com [209.85.216.175]) by smtp2.supelec.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1BAA080553; Mon, 18 Sep 2017 13:47:49 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: by mail-qt0-f175.google.com with SMTP id i50so224098qtf.0; Mon, 18 Sep 2017 04:47:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Gm-Message-State: AHPjjUhDREv2uNS7WsKXecvKaKIQbL8rfvBl6sIvwooXb/2/pEolDWpQ I3W7CThzifSQd/G/tcUfa5I3ZPj2oXz5t0J+BPs= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QByeoLnekRo2Hqc8wEGSdoDzF899LanHVC9y7/NQUnQU9o/6cGBi/2S+J5oQdCMVn5HA7XFAXAizgtP9ysiGZ8= X-Received: by 10.200.6.8 with SMTP id d8mr23750536qth.142.1505735269234; Mon, 18 Sep 2017 04:47:49 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.140.82.8 with HTTP; Mon, 18 Sep 2017 04:47:28 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20652871-2c71-4628-00e2-96532d5d6a45@cs.ucla.edu> X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 160.228.120.31 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:218455 Archived-At: --f403043b010cd93d3f0559754f65 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" 2017-09-18 2:26 GMT+02:00 Paul Eggert : > I attempted to work around this limitation by changing Gnulib to >>> assume that the correct value is 2**63 - 1 if it doesn't fit in 'long', >>> and by >>> merging the latest Gnulib into the emacs-26 branch. Please give it a try. >>> >> Did you forget to push this to the Emacs repository? >> > > Yes. Actually I did a 'push', but didn't notice that the push was to > another repository of mine, not to Savannah. It's a setup screwup that > occurred when I adjusted to the new emacs-26 branch. It should be fixed > now, in commit 6bbbc38b3421723521f7cdd4fd617a4fc889aceb to the emacs-26 > branch. > The warning in src/search.c has disappeared. But why commit this to the emacs-26 branch and not to the master branch ? -- Fabrice --f403043b010cd93d3f0559754f65 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


2017-09-18 2:26 GMT+02:00 Paul Eggert <eggert@cs.ucla.edu>:
I attempted to work around this limitation by changing Gnulib to
assume that the correct value is 2**63 - 1 if it doesn't fit in 'lo= ng', and by
merging the latest Gnulib into the emacs-26 branch. Please give it a try.
Did you forget to push this to the Emacs repository?

 Yes. Actually I did a 'push', but didn't notice that the push w= as to another repository of mine, not to Savannah. It's a setup screwup= that occurred when I adjusted to the new emacs-26 branch. It should be fix= ed now, in commit 6bbbc38b3421723521f7cdd4fd617a4fc889aceb to the emac= s-26 branch.

The warning in src/search.c has disappeared.

But why commit this to the emacs-26 branch and not t= o the master branch ?

--
Fabrice
--f403043b010cd93d3f0559754f65--