From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Fabrice Popineau Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Windows 64 port Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 18:22:14 +0100 Message-ID: References: <20120219211800.0000558f@unknown> <834numv7js.fsf@gnu.org> <83ty2ltep0.fsf@gnu.org> <4F4EEBC2.5070704@cs.ucla.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015175d04146360cc04bbd827b4 X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1332436981 1422 80.91.229.3 (22 Mar 2012 17:23:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 17:23:01 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , ajmr@ilovetortilladepatatas.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Paul Eggert Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 22 18:23:00 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SAlj1-000737-HB for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 18:22:59 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55515 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SAliy-0002JB-HK for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 13:22:56 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:58361) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SAliq-0002Hq-5U for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 13:22:54 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SAlio-00068p-Hn for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 13:22:47 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-bk0-f41.google.com ([209.85.214.41]:53753) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SAlif-00067V-TO; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 13:22:38 -0400 Original-Received: by bkwq16 with SMTP id q16so2405953bkw.0 for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 10:22:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=fBKj7PfyyVOyNt3FqHXSyZUKNNoWhTq7lkmmTJs6+d8=; b=YW+MevgipaQZlhmENS+dG+nBWXKaRUsjYLMCoxKGc3slZuIR5LRl0QiX4Xc63+Z5Z3 h0uk1kxuF+O29qWdwpKUrVZ76cZ3dwLxWkQuEQaFlm4yDgX0U+PoyyNUjSSHPvgWuo+Q rxl49fwrylB1OmAHgt9sVCdQ1IPQMmOFgc+seJM5mGLMC5XTUj5uwt5qJ0mEHjvDee2e uB46K0O+A9Ru1h2+xwQVtQipgORiTkGqKWWEHC6bdzv0Nhovy2/cjs/YnCJ1ZCh1dqdQ MeylGssa+K1BJl/5K+p/P7PIA43Pjd/csLeEx6HOguKOMINiqsB3g+YhzzNAiKhlj3ZW DIYA== Original-Received: by 10.204.154.153 with SMTP id o25mr3406057bkw.138.1332436954996; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 10:22:34 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.204.179.143 with HTTP; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 10:22:14 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4F4EEBC2.5070704@cs.ucla.edu> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 0limjr3lznhfAxibG7hd-0OzeF4 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 209.85.214.41 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:149172 Archived-At: --0015175d04146360cc04bbd827b4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 2012/3/1 Paul Eggert > > +#define SIZE ESIZE > > I don't see the reason for this #define; could you please explain? > If it is needed, let's just dump SIZE entirely, and use size_t instead. > Yes, that would be better. The header file (or rather one of its sub-header files) does define this symbol. I can provide the patch if it is agreed. -- Fabrice --0015175d04146360cc04bbd827b4 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

2012/3/1 Paul Eggert &= lt;eggert@cs.ucla.edu><= br>
> +#define SIZE ESIZE

I don't see the reason for this #define; could you please explain?
If it is needed, let's just dump SIZE entirely, and use size_t instead.=

Yes, that would be better.= The <windows.h> header file (or rather one of its
sub-head= er files) does define this symbol. I can provide the patch if it is agreed.=


--
Fabrice
--0015175d04146360cc04bbd827b4--