>
> The situation with the INT_RANGE_OVERFLOW check is similar, except
> there the macro is more like this:
>
>  #define a 2147483647
>  #define b 1
>  #define FOO (INT_ADD_OVERFLOW (a,b) ? INT_MAX : (a)+(b))
>  int i = FOO;
>
> Again, any compiler that warns about potential overflow of
> 2147483647+1 should be ignored, because the expression
> 2147483647+1 cannot possibly be evaluated.
>

Ok. I read the intprops.h file and I agree with this example.
Pity there is no other (simpler) way to handle this.

Thanks for the explanations.

Fabrice




-- 
Fabrice Popineau
-----------------------------
SUPELEC
Département Informatique
3, rue Joliot Curie
91192 Gif/Yvette Cedex
Tel direct : +33 (0) 169851950
Standard : +33 (0) 169851212
------------------------------