>
> ABLOCKS_BUSY is sometimes a pointer and sometimes an integer
> (converted to a pointer).  At the point when this code is executed:
>
>
So it is even worse than what I thought.



> I'm not saying the code can't be cleaned up -- it's pretty
> messy and this one line is just one corner of the mess.  But
> any cleanup can and should be done independently of the Windows 64
> port, and should be systematic rather than just fiddling
>

Ok. But in my defence, you may forget that I started from a point
where emacs didn't compile,  and when it compiled at least, it din't run.
In this case, the obvious strategy is to remove all the compilation
warnings, at least
those related to int/long/pointers datatypes.
And guess what ... once I did that, it worked.
Ok, it is not enough, but I spent already quite a time on it, I didn't see
myself testing the many combinations
of what was actually needed and what was optional.
Now, my patch may easily be split in as many parts as needed, and some
of them definitely omitted. I never expected that it could be taken "as is".
I only targeted a clean compile on my platform, and since I won't be able
to test
if it is harmless to other platforms, I'll let those who know judge what is
acceptable
and what needs to be rewritten.
I can only easily report if it still compiles and run on the MS platform
with their tools.

Best regards,

with this one line and making this line inconsistent with
> the (ab)use of ABLOCKS_BUSY in the rest of the module.
>
> My compilation was an optimized one, not that this matters
> much.
>



-- 
Fabrice Popineau
-----------------------------
SUPELEC
Département Informatique
3, rue Joliot Curie
91192 Gif/Yvette Cedex
Tel direct : +33 (0) 169851950
Standard : +33 (0) 169851212
------------------------------