From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Fabrice Popineau Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Windows 64 port Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2012 11:11:53 +0100 Message-ID: References: <20120219211800.0000558f@unknown> <834numv7js.fsf@gnu.org> <4F428780.8070902@cs.ucla.edu> <4F4D507F.7030008@cs.ucla.edu> <834ntfwxa6.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8ff1c4e22577d204bbe642f2 X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1332497563 26373 80.91.229.3 (23 Mar 2012 10:12:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2012 10:12:43 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, eggert@cs.ucla.edu, Andreas Schwab , ajmr@ilovetortilladepatatas.com To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 23 11:12:40 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SB1U5-000387-Gx for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 23 Mar 2012 11:12:37 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39603 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SB1U4-000654-SU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 23 Mar 2012 06:12:36 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:41323) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SB1Ty-000636-Iz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Mar 2012 06:12:35 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SB1Tr-0006dh-FD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Mar 2012 06:12:30 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-gx0-f169.google.com ([209.85.161.169]:48533) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SB1Tj-0006cM-Ui; Fri, 23 Mar 2012 06:12:16 -0400 Original-Received: by ggeq1 with SMTP id q1so3023326gge.0 for ; Fri, 23 Mar 2012 03:12:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=LJUAHcm/htS9p96WEUZaNzmiYy56d71kL4Op10su5tk=; b=AEv9IRHUCIolvhxnVUjKgUVz4W8woZgTShjNHmRwHwAsjPx6l3mscmHk/IQ/OdsLSl LyfoKk16aCfqE1/asCmq/PTjTodC4zw+4O+ZSlMQh08H5Zg0FWMg8fiw4i1sh8947Bp2 x3a0f4JzCHXen88/AWVK7h2KdJwSe7JELQlLGzy0n7acVlzvO8n1DZYSOoisfNLQ+V4U SSKe/9xQ1avgIhrssMsIDpxY2QcYnTVSoN0IKiBeTUuZ1Blq2fHVvtAT7f+CiRge7dbA 6rDdnas9Js6rdIMAZmGrNfBJ45jN+/9xcPcwHHYdKYwmFo9G1AGKJxFR3GAeVoWaFRFr 9Fcg== Original-Received: by 10.60.24.9 with SMTP id q9mr13704485oef.4.1332497533466; Fri, 23 Mar 2012 03:12:13 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.60.66.194 with HTTP; Fri, 23 Mar 2012 03:11:53 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <834ntfwxa6.fsf@gnu.org> X-Google-Sender-Auth: TjiBDxXj-HhyO1twh5YVQ0hAvgw X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 209.85.161.169 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:149191 Archived-At: --e89a8ff1c4e22577d204bbe642f2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Another mostly cosmetic question. Does GCC support: static NO_RETURN void fatal (const char *s1, const char *s2); rather than static void fatal (const char *s1, const char *s2) NO_RETURN; Fabrice --e89a8ff1c4e22577d204bbe642f2 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Another mostly cosmetic question.
Does GCC support:
static NO_RETURN void fatal (const char *s1, const char *s2);
rather than
static void fatal (const char *s1, const char *s2) NO_RETURN;

Fabrice
--e89a8ff1c4e22577d204bbe642f2--