From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Stefan Kangas Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Imports / inclusion of s.el into Emacs Date: Wed, 6 May 2020 07:21:28 -0400 Message-ID: References: <266155d4-f9c0-8ed3-8df5-32feea171076@yandex.ru> <87d07hl4kq.fsf@russet.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="123362"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: =?UTF-8?B?Sm/Do28gVMOhdm9yYQ==?= , Dmitry Gutov , Richard Stallman , Stefan Monnier , Emacs developers To: Phillip Lord , Philippe Vaucher Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed May 06 13:22:10 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jWI7u-000Vx3-9d for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 06 May 2020 13:22:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37892 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jWI7t-0002Z9-Af for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 06 May 2020 07:22:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:45926) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jWI7H-0001jD-PU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 May 2020 07:21:31 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-yb1-f177.google.com ([209.85.219.177]:42904) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jWI7G-0008SY-LB; Wed, 06 May 2020 07:21:31 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-yb1-f177.google.com with SMTP id i16so787211ybq.9; Wed, 06 May 2020 04:21:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=blK69FLM4EjXFvm0NXmBL8qeY0G4kRSzsef5pj4Wvzk=; b=Iilyr1SQV/Pmf6D1heLY3aLKjO2UDpzW+lfEcARKKkdKkZt8Korho3/QARP179MQsf WB3g6tZ/GTPOjak3/znvkPnOGg43ZjTeNjTTuXA/YJ/M73BzhzLpLNhXjpFTYUMfeYJ1 Ugotg1543OBaHfo+VAGXa4c7wy61bVkwtIjqsDPGNFihXcLHu/JlyQp0z7zNksOc54NE 5WL/H0Y7+wwBRFdE1+DiarU+2wUfo6av0DsdkzCUAtSkqI3MW3DpRaPm2SD35TCbkew4 oAIuH0jIXnmQKxFc+q+SmykCJsaJ8YwP7hiRetY11UFh0JCWUTTikJ8CGa4yee+LRioa /4qg== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuZHKECZSf+VhWyk/tmRBqCctn+GNHDHR1MHEKgCD6h4vTE2N+DZ 3zhcMDLI0iV85dnfyDhbfhkS9sgnvml1bf/7+I8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypJvUDw658iL1XAsI0Hcq9FmOtgYLezDpm12jICc8tGuzOeIJTJ8O9yt6k9uXzBGvN1pvwuT52xhAm08CVZb7Yc= X-Received: by 2002:a25:5c4:: with SMTP id 187mr12930550ybf.181.1588764089295; Wed, 06 May 2020 04:21:29 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Wed, 6 May 2020 07:21:28 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87d07hl4kq.fsf@russet.org.uk> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.219.177; envelope-from=stefankangas@gmail.com; helo=mail-yb1-f177.google.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/05/06 07:21:29 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -15 X-Spam_score: -1.6 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:249079 Archived-At: Phillip Lord writes: >>> Hmm, looking closer. Is it enough for the package maintainer to just >>> push the latest changes to the 'externals/dash' branch in addition to >>> the original repository? >> >> If so I think it's reasonable. Out of curiosity can we also do this >> with the master branch? > > And version bump! Maybe someone should have a look at the elpa.git README to see if there's anything missing, or if this could be made even clearer. I'd volunteer, but I'm not sure I understand the full process. It would also be good if all this information was easily accessible from the https://elpa.gnu.org website. I know there's a link to the README, but that fails the "easily accessible" criterion, I think. Best regards, Stefan Kangas