From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Kangas Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: master 556c304007 2/2: * .dir-locals.el: Set emacs-lisp-docstring-fill-column. Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2022 03:32:28 +0200 Message-ID: References: <165532942662.19523.10781565463941596726@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <20220615214347.17E81C01686@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <86mtdmrtew.fsf@mail.linkov.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="25541"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Emacs developers , Sean Whitton To: Juri Linkov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Jul 09 03:33:25 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1o9zLZ-0006T7-43 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 09 Jul 2022 03:33:25 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55284 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1o9zLX-0007cG-TA for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 08 Jul 2022 21:33:23 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:37916) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1o9zKt-0006xc-1x for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Jul 2022 21:32:43 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pl1-f178.google.com ([209.85.214.178]:36757) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1o9zKr-0007M1-Do for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Jul 2022 21:32:42 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-pl1-f178.google.com with SMTP id m2so200445plx.3 for ; Fri, 08 Jul 2022 18:32:41 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=qGYAMJeWvSuJVLKxPUh5Gaber/ORHcOF8Rg4GS+n+vk=; b=BgEYNf+nmwQBj4mh+nWMVd6NeDuuPw5X4HHncwNl3/5q6/pqDAlTHN+9WVtftKLfE9 p2f3TMNZqK6uLyGhycSujL38G7sdf6Q39qktjKMIQV98U7bINqXhJOd47zycSSVWhMBP G+TuuMJ9NB+vDJi93c9pbYFStTyyKU0wGzjurmLxPFgDLaNKtGE1fUfLabNm+mX3MeX3 wKoXS8b8Kwvw/IcdbP3RegDIb/Reac8KW+yPFVt+yDWt9EAoTlGtnWBZxWiLfUM/W82d RhlkDAZQ1rJk9VoKzY4iZdTkFjwBSPZxOrCJECA6s6Ze+iLm2x01+H9xfbJF+nX8yrxW 30Og== X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora8mUxAV2xn8RSwhZ5dl4wXaGbSfsWev6vFODDhltFauyAz0E3Mu 49bzZvWWP9iZ8tMATAMdnfnObEA/ttsjrdNTIQo= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1ve3PODfy4qNIKKn9GYednn/bBfew7bS+5BqQXihE0H6okeCE1wu6jWTdNqN3FfxTyclSm5UHtFQiH66SjOg4U= X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:4d8d:b0:1ef:e3a1:d1bd with SMTP id oj13-20020a17090b4d8d00b001efe3a1d1bdmr3025620pjb.175.1657330360012; Fri, 08 Jul 2022 18:32:40 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <86mtdmrtew.fsf@mail.linkov.net> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.214.178; envelope-from=stefankangas@gmail.com; helo=mail-pl1-f178.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -13 X-Spam_score: -1.4 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:291981 Archived-At: Juri Linkov writes: > >> + (emacs-lisp-docstring-fill-column . 65) > > > > And why don't we raise the default to 70 to get ready for the larger > > displays of the early 2000's? > > Why not 75? It's still less than the hard limit of 80 characters > for the 80x24 terminal window. Fine by me, but `fill-column' defaults to 70 and I guess it would be nice if they were the same. Maybe 72 or 78 (RFC 2822) is more standard though.