From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Stefan Kangas <stefankangas@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Changes for emacs 28
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2020 14:51:28 -0700
Message-ID: <CADwFkmnW9Zn3nkRU+qmS2Ae=NPTueTeR7eQ2uHf5LDfPtF2rNA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <87y2lkb6kb.fsf@gmail.com>
 <9A4FA038-CCFD-45DF-8B57-E348AFF951D9@gmail.com>
 <87sgbsb0eb.fsf@gmail.com> <jwvft7rynu7.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
 <87h7s6c31d.fsf@gmail.com> <jwvd02uygtp.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
 <87mu1xrjqw.fsf@gkayaalp.com> <48ed4897-356c-4669-a330-1fdb5d65402b@default>
 <CAP_d_8VYOrFJ6=3boUDvdxTQkEm=ZdUtE+nm2M+kuZdoCBg48g@mail.gmail.com>
 <83lfhhijbl.fsf@gnu.org> <871rj9uz12.fsf@gkayaalp.com>
 <E1kGaUG-0004lJ-5M@fencepost.gnu.org>
 <87wo10tzga.fsf@gkayaalp.com> <87363o3ahp.fsf@gnus.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214";
	logging-data="31849"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io"
Cc: casouri@gmail.com, rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org, ghe@sdf.org,
 eliz@gnu.org, yuri.v.khan@gmail.com, drew.adams@oracle.com, tecosaur@gmail.com
To: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org>,
 =?UTF-8?B?R8O2a3R1xJ8gS2F5YWFscA==?= <self@gkayaalp.com>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 11 23:52:18 2020
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17])
	by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1kGqxu-0008Bh-Av
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 23:52:18 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33580 helo=lists1p.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1kGqxt-0007pQ-CQ
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 17:52:17 -0400
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:45730)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <stefankangas@gmail.com>)
 id 1kGqxA-0006wj-To
 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 17:51:32 -0400
Original-Received: from mail-ej1-x630.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::630]:45805)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <stefankangas@gmail.com>)
 id 1kGqx9-00030p-AJ; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 17:51:32 -0400
Original-Received: by mail-ej1-x630.google.com with SMTP id i26so15575475ejb.12;
 Fri, 11 Sep 2020 14:51:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
 h=from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to
 :cc; bh=wydnEiXmDidEt6HunmlDBuT0BbLCNEApTCAGCkehHZ0=;
 b=PTHWX/aZt8BL/bhJWIA9BGrxWO6KonGMCXdCPJWCEwmRXaiojoq/TVpPNoRE96I4CG
 msKZP8uOV6KWgov0vmk0Uuxv+Md8HvgZrrKPbW4uZMgaLcfLimiw6QiS2/tDjPKGW9vu
 nOepTwWpKYqegwXmWe3XAbSC+iPjU2pKugiMDGrgmV45DztzDllw2O0uAKxyBuMAuQQ4
 5NVDEXm+uXpoL+LxPG+1qo04qvkyPFnWi2PXwsmPjOdYnQh/0NvwOLqomGyYx9InTZvz
 5OXIjlbBtbBRlyenuzCYVvvBmytqhgbG3lSNGB/gZO8putfLvYYsjS8wAlZ5XSrl7QaL
 ttAQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date
 :message-id:subject:to:cc;
 bh=wydnEiXmDidEt6HunmlDBuT0BbLCNEApTCAGCkehHZ0=;
 b=uCiF4t64eYkeeQZQAx9ofGX+DRL2nsu68Z4Z9osemEvng7ybddjFc/T/exaBNlOuG6
 Ao/R/tWQbw8mUSu15xTVdFVncwHl6LmkjERueglCv+fnWtmXlmeNaSGRkG/D0kcnz/Z2
 Fzzu+ZbSe8gwqZqOIdW2UKLxBTGolAYE+7E8HuWXqDAIYnriFl14+R/BsjLErXocpqti
 IowNAmlLpMTLiN/jaLsu4ECnYIcmd70yMDIcAFJnvfmdg3UO/11mZFU8FsoF0uKPEZm1
 PU8ceVT9QKHyLZF3nw8L0Jatp15v+wOKAor1U7lsxjRjyCZgC+rhOK5mbxmcwZm2yALj
 83bw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533QYjEG4YazfVBed79DJCqBX4ieR+kRsmKIXnD1Ahiepuqw7f2p
 tAWE0pS1BWiIpEQYjweNAuBBXyhPEjY8hGVwmu4=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzAax2vimU+81qgJwVJqZbf4W5RmIzasLamg2obW7Ph9tZ+0hYS04D5g1sBLoVFtKgDKFoBbAv8KXjhPFFxWTU=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:6993:: with SMTP id
 i19mr3788702ejr.26.1599861089333; 
 Fri, 11 Sep 2020 14:51:29 -0700 (PDT)
Original-Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with
 HTTPREST; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 14:51:28 -0700
In-Reply-To: <87363o3ahp.fsf@gnus.org>
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::630;
 envelope-from=stefankangas@gmail.com; helo=mail-ej1-x630.google.com
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: No matching host in p0f cache.
 That's all we know.
X-Spam_score_int: -20
X-Spam_score: -2.1
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1,
 DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001,
 SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Spam_action: no action
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel"
 <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:255247
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/255247>

Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org> writes:

> For what it's worth, I do not think this is a good idea.  Emacs
> distributors should do whatever they think is best, and for emacs-devel
> to chide them (even as gently as in these issues) for their decisions is
> counter-productive at best.

Good point.  I never considered that it could be seen as chiding them.
Maybe it was a mistake for me to insist on this idea.